Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual vs Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual

Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Generic

17 reasons for

Volkswagen Golf VI Variant, model available from 2008.
It has 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP diesel engine produced from 2009 to 2013.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Mazda 3 II Hatchback, model available from 2009.
It has 1.6 MZR 105HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2011.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual
Volkswagen

17 reasons for Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.5 > 6.3 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual's advantage. This vehicle burns 29 percent fewer diesel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Mazda 3 II Hatchback. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the C class, in which the Volkswagen Golf VI is classified, is 6.8 l while the Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual uses by 34 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

250 > 144 Nm
The Volkswagen has 106 Nm more torque in relation to the Mazda 3 II. Even though most of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when choosing a car, it informs the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is of considerable size thus the Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual will deliver you better feeling of driving.
56

Urban consumption

5.5 > 8.3 l
The Volkswagen Golf VI Variant burns up 34 percent of oil less in city traffic in comparison to the Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual. The Volkswagen Golf VI Variant, which comes from compact segment, burns up 3.2 l fewer diesel, which is by 37 % lower result in comparison to the average in the same class. The difference in fuel economy between these two cars is quite big, so note that so as to the comparison was adequate, you should choose models with similar parameters.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.9 > 12.2 s
The Mazda 3 II Hatchback can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared to the Volkswagen Golf VI Variant. The difference at the level of 0.3 s is quite little and it should not be strongly taken into as important for selecting the better one of compared cars.
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 340 l
With more trunk space the Volkswagen will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional one than the Mazda 3 II. If the capacity of the trunk is important to you, the Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual will be better to choose as it is about 49 % more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
33

Top speed

190 > 184 km/h
The top speed of the Volkswagen Golf VI is greater as compared to this of the Mazda 3 II Hatchback which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 3 % is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
This huge difference results from the fact that both vehicles are equipped with different engines. The Volkswagen Golf VI Variant has the diesel engine and the Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual has the petrol engine. Taking into account different kinds of engines, comparing this feature has no sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.9 > 5.3 l
22

Width

1,784 > 1,755 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The Volkswagen Golf VI Variant is widther only by 29 mm in relation to the Mazda 3 II and is not really relevant. The average for the ā€žCā€ class equals to 1,703 millimeters and is by 5 percent smaller than the same attribute of the Volkswagen.
19

Range

1,222 > 846 km
12

Urban range

965 > 647 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,410 > 1,038 km
6

Length

4,535 > 4,460 mm
The Volkswagen is 2 percent longer than the Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Volkswagen will be better driven ,however, the Mazda will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
1

Height

1,504 > 1,470 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 34 millimeters to the advantage of the Volkswagen is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,400 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,977 > 1,770 kg
0

Curb weight

1,444 > 1,185 kg

Mazda

6 reasons for Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105KM manual in comparison to Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual

Reasons for
15

Wheelbase

2,633 > 2,584 mm
Mazda 3 II has 49 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Volkswagen Golf VI. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
9

Ground clearance

157 > 140 mm
Ground clearance means the space between the vehicle underbody and the ground. From these two cars, it is the Mazda which has 12 percent higher ground clearance than the Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual. This is why the Mazda 3 II Hatchback will cope better in difficult terrain and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the Mazda 3 II.
8

Maximum load capacity

580 > 535 kg
4

Rear track

1,520 > 1,508 mm
1

Model release date

2009 > 2008
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Mazda 3 II may feature more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Front track

1,535 > 1,534 mm

Cars specifications

Volkswagen Golf VI Variant 1.6 TDI-CR DPF 105HP manual Mazda 3 II Hatchback 1.6 MZR 105HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,699 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2009
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK