Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual vs Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

15 reasons for

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 PureTech 110HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

10 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
Peugeot

15 reasons for Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

110 > 100 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that majority of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual that has by 10 horsepower more in relation to the Mazda, which makes this car somewhat faster. Because of more horsepower the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d will also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

4.6 > 4.9 l
The Peugeot 308 II burns up 0.3 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Mazda 3 III. The Peugeot, being classified in „compact” segment consumes by 2.2 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6.8 l.
59

Maximal torque

204 > 149 Nm
The Peugeot 308 II has 37 percent more torque when compared to the Mazda 3 III. The difference at this level is quite big, what means that the Peugeot 308 II will be seeding up perceptibly faster.
56

Urban consumption

5.8 > 6.3 l
The Peugeot burns up of 0.5 l fuel fewer in city traffic compared to the Mazda 3 III Hatchback. The Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d, as a representative of small family cars segment, uses 2.9 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “C” class equals to 8.7 l of fuel for every 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

419 > 365 l
The boot of the Peugeot is only 54 l bigger than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback. However, the difference is not significant and it would be fair to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk capacity.
33

Top speed

188 > 182 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Peugeot is higher in comparison to this of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 3 percent is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is generated clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Peugeot. The engine of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 2,510 revolutions/minute worst result compared with the Peugeot.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 4.3 l
19

Range

1,152 > 1,000 km
19

Fuel tank

54 > 51 l
In this category it is the Peugeot that can contain 6 percent more fuel in relation to the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual. The medium fuel tank capacity in the small family cars class, from which the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d comes from, amounts to 52 l, whereas in small family cars segment (represented by the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual) it is 52 l.
12

Urban range

914 > 785 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,359 > 1,186 km
1

Height

1,456 > 1,450 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual, which is by 6 mm higher than the Mazda, would be better option for you. However, presented cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

861 > 928 mm

Mazda

10 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 11.1 s
A little difference at the level of 0.3 s shows that the Peugeot 308 II is the worst vehicle of these two compared. In the „lower middle segment, being represented by the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d, the average acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 0.2 s lower than this of Peugeot car.
22

Width

2,056 > 1,809 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is widther by 14 % in relation to the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual and is not really worth considering. The average for the „compact” class amounts to around 1,703 millimeters and is by 353 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mazda 3 III.
15

Wheelbase

2,701 > 2,620 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Mazda 3 III has 81 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,496 > 1,200 cc
The Mazda 3 III has by 296 cubic centimeters bigger engine displacement in relation to the Peugeot. This may have a little impact as far as acceleration is concerned, as both figures are quite simmilar.
8

Maximum load capacity

524 > 450 kg
6

Length

4,464 > 4,249 mm
The Mazda 3 III is 5 percent longer than the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d. The length of the car plays a role in respect of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Mazda preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Mazda will be better driven ,however, the Peugeot 308 II will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .
0

Payload

1,800 > 1,722 kg
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,281 > 1,265 kg

Cars specifications

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,722 kg 1,800 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK