Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual vs Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Renault Fluence Sedan, model available from 2009.
It has 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP diesel engine produced from 2009.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

14 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
Renault

15 reasons for Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.6 > 4.9 l
The Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual uses 0.3 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Mazda 3 III. The Renault Fluence Sedan, which is palced in „lower middle” segment burns up by 2.2 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6.8 l.
59

Maximal torque

200 > 149 Nm
Thanks to 34 percent greater torque, the engine of the Renault does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual. This, in turn, produces better a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

5.3 > 6.3 l
The Renault Fluence Sedan consumes 1 liter less fuel in city traffic compared to the Mazda. The Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual, which comes from compact class, burns up 3.4 l less fuel. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small family cars segment is 8.7 l, while the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual uses by 39 % less amount of fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

529 > 365 l
With more boot size the Renault will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional vehicle than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual. If the capacity of the boot is appeals to you, the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual will be better to choose as it is around 164 liters larger than the boot of its competitor.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
This huge difference results from the fact that both compared vehicles have various engines. The Renault Fluence has the diesel engine while the Mazda is equipped with the petrol engine. Because of the fact that these cars has different kinds of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4 > 4.3 l
19

Range

1,364 > 1,000 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 51 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank size is Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual that is able to carry by 10 liters more oil than the Mazda.
12

Urban range

1,132 > 785 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,500 > 1,186 km
6

Length

4,618 > 4,464 mm
The Renault is 154 millimeters longer when compared to the Mazda 3 III. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases provide more storage space. Although the Renault Fluence occurs to be better pick for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mazda 3 III may appeal to the young as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,479 > 1,450 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Renault Fluence Sedan, which is by 2 percent higher than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback, would be better pick for you. However, these two cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

3,750 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

906 > 928 mm
0

Curb weight

1,303 > 1,281 kg

Mazda

14 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100KM manual in comparison to Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

100 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mazda that has by 11 percent horsepower more in relation to the Renault, which makes this car a bit better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the Mazda 3 III Hatchback should as well provide slightly more efficiency in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 13 s
A little difference in the amount of 2.2 s indicates that the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact segment, being represented by the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 11.3 s and is by 1.7 s higher than this of Renault vehicle.
33

Top speed

182 > 175 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Mazda 3 III is greater in comparison to this of the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 4 percent is not big and is imperceptible in everyday use.
22

Width

2,056 > 1,809 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is 247 millimeters wider when compared to the Renault. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,701 > 2,693 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Mazda 3 III Hatchback has 8 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Renault Fluence. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda 3 III should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda 3 III has only one extra gear than the Renault. Usually the additional speed is a taller one thanks to which the previous speeds can be shorter to give increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear also have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
9

Ground clearance

157 > 122 mm
Ground clearance is the gap between the car underbody and the road. As far as the two compared vehicles are concerned, it is the Mazda which has 35 mm higher ground clearance in comparison to the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual. For this reason the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual will cope better with rough terrain and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the vehicle.
8

Engine capacity

1,496 > 1,462 cc
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback has 34 cc larger engine displacement in comparison to the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual. As the difference is not big, the Mazda should accelerate only a bit better, of course if other paramerters are equal.
8

Maximum load capacity

524 > 487 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally is a hatchback and as a result the Mazda 3 III Hatchback, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat giving more space for cargo, has an advantage over the 4-door Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual which in turn has a smaller trunk cut off from the passenger compartment.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2009
Given that the Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual debuted only 4 years earlier than the Mazda, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Mazda 3 III may feature slightly more advanced solutions applied in it.
0

Payload

1,800 > 1,780 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8

Cars specifications

Renault Fluence Sedan 1.5 dCi FAP 90HP manual Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2009 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,780 kg 1,800 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK