Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual vs Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe (Mario Lehmann) Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

21 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Seat Toledo IV, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 75HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual
Mazda

21 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100KM manual in comparison to Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

100 > 75 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Mazda 3 III which has by 33 % more horsepower in relation to the Seat Toledo IV. As a result the Mazda 3 III Hatchback can achieve higher velocity. Having more horsepower the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual should also provide seemingly better flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 5.9 l
The Mazda burns up 17 percent less fuel in the combined cycle than the Seat Toledo IV. The Mazda 3 III Hatchback, which is classified in „lower middle” segment uses by 1.9 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6.8 l.
59

Maximal torque

149 > 112 Nm
Due to 37 newton meters greater torque, the engine of the Mazda 3 III does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Seat Toledo IV. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6.3 > 8.2 l
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback uses 1.9 l of petrol fewer in city traffic in relation to the Seat Toledo IV. The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual, which represents compact segment, consumes 2.4 l less gasoline, which is by 27 percent lower result in comparison to the average in its class. The difference in fuel economy between these two cars is quite big, so note that in order to the the comparison have a sense, you should select cars with similar characteristics.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.8 > 13.9 s
The Seat accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower compared with the Mazda 3 III Hatchback. The difference at the level of 22 percent is not really significant and it should not be substantially taken into consideration when choosing one of these two cars.
33

Top speed

182 > 175 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Mazda is greater in comparison to this of the Seat Toledo IV which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 4 % is little and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 4.8 l
22

Width

2,056 > 1,701 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Mazda 3 III is 21 % wider than the Seat Toledo IV. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

1,000 > 902 km
15

Wheelbase

2,701 > 2,608 mm
The Mazda has 93 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Seat Toledo IV. As a result the Mazda is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
12

Urban range

785 > 655 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,186 > 1,146 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual have a higher gear count than the Seat Toledo IV which means that Mazda 3 III would have faster acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,496 > 1,199 cc
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual has 25 percent larger cubic capacity than the Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual. For the reason that the difference is small, the Mazda 3 III Hatchback should accelerate only slightly faster, of course if other paramerters are the same.
8

Maximum load capacity

524 > 460 kg
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car usually means a hatchback and as a result the Mazda 3 III, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat giving more space for cargo, has an advantage on the four-door Seat with the hinges for the boot that opens under the rear window.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
Given that the Seat Toledo IV's production began only 1 year before the Mazda, the gap between technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Mazda might feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
0

Payload

1,800 > 1,598 kg
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,281 > 1,144 kg

Seat

7 reasons for Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

549 > 365 l
The Seat has 184 l more capable trunk in relation to the Mazda. Such a difference is big so it will matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Seat Toledo IV has 40 % bigger boot size than the average in its segment. More spacious boot will be useful during family traveling as well as during everyday car’s usage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,750 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine achieves its full output with increase in revolutions. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt faster.
19

Fuel tank

55 > 51 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Seat Toledo IV which can contain 8 % more fuel than the Mazda 3 III. The medium fuel container size in the C class, from which the Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual comes from, is 52 l, whereas in C class (represented by the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual) it equals 52 liters.
6

Length

4,480 > 4,464 mm
The Seat Toledo IV is 16 millimeters longer in relation to the Mazda. Long cars are more spacious and also provide plenty of trunk space. While the Seat seems to be better for families or drivers who value soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mazda 3 III Hatchback may appeal to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,459 > 1,450 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Seat Toledo IV, which is by 9 mm higher than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual, is better choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,400 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

865 > 928 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual Seat Toledo IV 1.2 75HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 745 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK