The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual that has by 5 % horsepower more than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Skoda Octavia III should also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
Maximum torque of the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual is 17 percent higher than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual. As a result, the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Skoda Octavia III will use on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
The fuel consumption of the Skoda Octavia III is 0.3 l better in relation to the Mazda. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long term it may make that your car would be considerably less expensive to use.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A small difference at the level of 3 % suggests that the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual is the worst car of these two . In the „compact class, being represented by the Mazda, the medium acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 0.5 s lower than this of Mazda vehicle.
With more trunk space the Skoda Octavia III will have much more room for loading things and be more functional car than the Mazda 3 III. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is important to you, the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual will be better to choose as it is around 67 % more spacious than the boot of its contender.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The top speed of the Skoda Octavia III is greater as compared to this of the Mazda which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 11 kilometers/hour is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Skoda. The engine of the Mazda 3 III reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 2,610 revolutions per minute lower compared with the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual.
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is worst that the Skoda Octavia III in the category of fuel tank size. The Skoda is able to take by 8 percent more fuel than its competitor.
Maximum load capacity
The Skoda is 196 mm longer when compared to the Mazda 3 III Hatchback. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Skoda Octavia III preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Skoda Octavia III will be better driven but the Mazda 3 III will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual, which is by 28 mm higher than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback, is better pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.