Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual vs Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Miloslav Rejha Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

18 reasons for

Skoda Octavia III Estate, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 TSI 105HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
Skoda

18 reasons for Skoda Octavia III Kombi 1.2 TSI 105KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

105 > 100 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual that has by 5 % horsepower more than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual, which makes this vehicle a bit better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Skoda Octavia III should also provide somewhat better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

174 > 149 Nm
Maximum torque of the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual is 17 percent higher than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual. As a result, the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Skoda Octavia III will use on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 6.3 l
The fuel consumption of the Skoda Octavia III is 0.3 l better in relation to the Mazda. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long term it may make that your car would be considerably less expensive to use.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 10.8 s
A small difference at the level of 3 % suggests that the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual is the worst car of these two . In the „compact class, being represented by the Mazda, the medium acceleration is 11.3 s and is by 0.5 s lower than this of Mazda vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

610 > 365 l
With more trunk space the Skoda Octavia III will have much more room for loading things and be more functional car than the Mazda 3 III. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is important to you, the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual will be better to choose as it is around 67 % more spacious than the boot of its contender.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,739 > 1,248 l
33

Top speed

193 > 182 km/h
The top speed of the Skoda Octavia III is greater as compared to this of the Mazda which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 11 kilometers/hour is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,395 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Skoda. The engine of the Mazda 3 III reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 2,610 revolutions per minute lower compared with the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual.
19

Range

1,078 > 1,000 km
19

Fuel tank

55 > 51 l
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is worst that the Skoda Octavia III in the category of fuel tank size. The Skoda is able to take by 8 percent more fuel than its competitor.
12

Urban range

917 > 785 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,222 > 1,186 km
8

Maximum load capacity

570 > 524 kg
6

Length

4,660 > 4,464 mm
The Skoda is 196 mm longer when compared to the Mazda 3 III Hatchback. The length of the car is significant when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Skoda Octavia III preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Skoda Octavia III will be better driven but the Mazda 3 III will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,478 > 1,450 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual, which is by 28 mm higher than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback, is better pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,821 > 1,800 kg
0

Front overhang

888 > 928 mm

Mazda

10 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100KM manual in comparison to Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 5 l
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual consumes 2 % fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Skoda Octavia III Estate. The difference in the amount of 2 % is not very appreciable. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 4.5 l
22

Width

2,056 > 1,817 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Mazda is larger only by 239 millimeters in comparison to the Skoda Octavia III and is not really important. The medium for the „C” segment is 1,703 millimeters and is by 353 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback.
15

Wheelbase

2,701 > 2,684 mm
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual has 17 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual. Consequently the Mazda is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
9

Ground clearance

157 > 140 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in several important characteristics of a vehicle. Clearance is very important for off-road vehicles still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual has 17 millimeters larger clearance when compared with the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual. Apart from effective mobility in rough terrain, the Mazda 3 III Hatchback will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,496 > 1,198 cc
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual has 298 cubic centimeters bigger cubic capacity than the Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual should accelerate only slightly better, assuming that other paramerters are does not play a role.
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,281 > 1,248 kg

Cars specifications

Skoda Octavia III Estate 1.2 TSI 105HP manual Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,495 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK