Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4 vs Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Volvo V40 II Cross Country, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 T4 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
Volvo

16 reasons for Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 100 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of us look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4 that has by 80 more horsepower when compared to the Mazda. Therefore the Volvo V40 II will achieve higher velocity. Having more horsepower the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4 will as well provide better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

300 > 149 Nm
When you push the gas and you start speeding up quickly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will notice it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Volvo because it has 151 Nm more torque in relation to the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual. Compared vehicles differ so much that only driving the Volvo you will have a pleasurable feeling of getting pressed back in the seat as it starts to accelerate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.2 > 10.8 s
A little difference in the amount of 24 % indicates that the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact segment, being represented by the Mazda 3 III, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 11.3 s and is by 5 % lower than this of Mazda car.
33

Top speed

210 > 182 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Volvo V40 II Cross Country is greater in comparison to this of the Mazda by 28 kilometers/hour, which allows the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4 to overcome faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 15 % is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,700 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is produced indicates how fast an engine achieves its full performance with increase in rmp. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
19

Fuel tank

52 > 51 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Volvo which can contain 1 l more fuel compared with the Mazda. The average fuel container size in the small family cars segment, which is represented by the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4, amounts to 52 liters, whereas in small family cars segment (represented by the Mazda 3 III) it amounts to 52 liters.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
8

Engine capacity

1,985 > 1,496 cc
The Volvo V40 II has 489 cc greater engine size in relation to the Mazda 3 III. The difference is relatively big. For this reason the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity results in worst fuel consumption.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,459 > 1,450 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference of 1 % to the advantage of the Volvo V40 II is little and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To drivers who value more convenient use of a vehicle and who don’t want complications that stems from the manual transmission we recommend cars equipped with automatic transmission. For those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox might be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,014 > 1,800 kg
0

Front overhang

907 > 928 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Curb weight

1,578 > 1,281 kg

Mazda

13 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100KM manual in comparison to Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 7.9 l
The Mazda 3 III consumes 38 % less amount of fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 38 % will be realy noticeable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6.3 > 11.1 l
The fuel economy (urban) is considerably to the Mazda 3 III's advantage. This vehicle consumes 43 percent fewer petrol running around the town in relation to the Volvo V40 II. Better fuel econumy means an increase in cruising range.
38

Trunk capacity

365 > 335 l
The trunk of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual is only 30 liters bigger than the Volvo. However, the difference is not big it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot space.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 6.3 l
22

Width

2,056 > 1,783 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda is 15 percent wider in relation to the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

1,000 > 650 km
15

Wheelbase

2,701 > 2,650 mm
The Mazda has 51 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Volvo V40 II. Therefore the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

785 > 468 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,186 > 825 km
9

Ground clearance

157 > 147 mm
Ground clearance means the space between the car underbody and the road. As far as the two compared vehicles are concerned, it is the Mazda 3 III Hatchback that has 7 % higher ride height than the Volvo V40 II. For this reason the Mazda 3 III will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the vehicle.
8

Maximum load capacity

524 > 431 kg
6

Length

4,464 > 4,365 mm
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is 99 millimeters longer than the Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually have bigger trunk. Although the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual seems to be better option for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable driving, the Volvo may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual may feature more modern technologies.

Cars specifications

Volvo V40 II Cross Country 2.0 T4 180HP automatic 4x4 Mazda 3 III Hatchback 1.5 SKYACTIV-G 100HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,500 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2012 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK