The horsepower is a this thing that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Mazda 3 III, which has by 105 more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi, which makes this car distinctly better in terms of top speed. Because of more horsepower the Mazda will also provide significantly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
If you are looking for a vehicles for long cruises, which could carry more things in the boot , decide to buy the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. The Mitsubishi has by 14 percent smaller trunk than the Mitsubishi so in this case you would be able to put in the trunk one little suitcase less. Assessing the trunk also check its dimensions which have substantial impact on loading possibility .
Trunk capacity with seats down
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is 386 millimeters wider in comparison to the Mitsubishi Lancer V. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback loses with the Mazda in the category of fuel tank size. The Mazda is able to hold by 4 percent more fuel in comparison to its rival.
Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual has 249 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Mitsubishi. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is 5 percent longer when compared to the Mitsubishi. Long cars have more interior space and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Mazda 3 III occurs to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Mitsubishi may appeal to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 45 mm to the advantage of the Mazda 3 III is little and does not matter much.