Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback 1.3 (C61A) 60HP

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe (Mario Lehmann) Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

9 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

No reasons for

Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback, model available from 1988 to 1994.
It has 1.3 (C61A) 60HP petrol engine produced from 1988 to 1992.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback 1.3 (C61A) 60HP
Mazda

9 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback 1.3 (C61A) 60HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 60 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Mazda 3 III, which has by 105 more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi, which makes this car distinctly better in terms of top speed. Because of more horsepower the Mazda will also provide significantly more flexiblility in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

365 > 320 l
If you are looking for a vehicles for long cruises, which could carry more things in the boot , decide to buy the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. The Mitsubishi has by 14 percent smaller trunk than the Mitsubishi so in this case you would be able to put in the trunk one little suitcase less. Assessing the trunk also check its dimensions which have substantial impact on loading possibility .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,248 > 950 l
22

Width

2,056 > 1,670 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is 386 millimeters wider in comparison to the Mitsubishi Lancer V. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

51 > 49 l
The Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback loses with the Mazda in the category of fuel tank size. The Mazda is able to hold by 4 percent more fuel in comparison to its rival.
15

Wheelbase

2,701 > 2,452 mm
Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual has 249 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Mitsubishi. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
6

Length

4,464 > 4,235 mm
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is 5 percent longer when compared to the Mitsubishi. Long cars have more interior space and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Mazda 3 III occurs to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Mitsubishi may appeal to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,450 > 1,405 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 45 mm to the advantage of the Mazda 3 III is little and does not matter much.
1

Model release date

2013 > 1988

Mitsubishi

No reasons for Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback 1.3 (C61A) 60KM in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual


Cars specifications

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Mitsubishi Lancer V Hatchback 1.3 (C61A) 60HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 1988
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,800 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK