The Peugeot uses 1 l fewer in the combined cycle in relation to the Mazda 3 III. The difference at the level of 1 l is not significant. At the same time in the long term it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
The Peugeot consumes 1.5 l fewer petrol running around the town than the Mazda. The difference at the level of 21 % is quite noticeable in daily use of the ride. But, in a long run it will bring you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how you drive
If you need a car by which you could set of for cruises, which could load more luggage , decide to buy the Peugeot. The Mazda has by 15 percent smaller boot than the Mazda so you would be able to load one bag less. When it comes to the boot also check its dimensions which have considerable impact on loading capability .
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d. The engine of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 63 % worst result compared with the Peugeot.
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d which can contain 6 % more fuel compared with the Mazda 3 III Hatchback. The medium fuel tank capacity in the small family cars segment, which is represented by the Peugeot 308 II, equals 52 liters, whereas in small family cars segment (represented by the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual) it equals 52 liters.
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Peugeot 308 II, which is by 6 millimeters higher than the Mazda, would be better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.