Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe (Mario Lehmann) Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

13 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 PureTech 110HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual
Mazda

13 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 110 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Mazda 3 III which has by 55 more horsepower than the Peugeot. As a result the Mazda is able to reach higher maximum speed. Because of more horsepower the Mazda 3 III Hatchback will as well provide seemingly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

209 > 204 Nm
The Mazda has 2 % more torque when compared to the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual. Although most of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it reflects the best how fast a vehicle acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little and for that reason it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.2 > 11.1 s
If a dynamic driving is what you are really in to, the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual will appeal to you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 2.9 s faster than the Peugeot 308 II.
33

Top speed

210 > 188 km/h
The maximum speed of the Mazda 3 III is greater as compared to this of the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 12 % is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
22

Width

2,056 > 1,809 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda 3 III is 14 % wider when compared to the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,701 > 2,620 mm
Mazda 3 III Hatchback has 3 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Peugeot 308 II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,200 cc
The engine capacity of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is by 67 % greater in comparison to the Peugeot. As a result the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Maximum load capacity

524 > 450 kg
6

Length

4,464 > 4,249 mm
The Mazda is 215 millimeters longer when compared to the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases have plenty of trunk space. Although the Mazda 3 III Hatchback seems to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate comfortable rides, the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual may appeal to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
0

Payload

1,800 > 1,722 kg
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,281 > 1,265 kg

Peugeot

12 reasons for Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.6 > 5.6 l
The Peugeot uses 1 l fewer in the combined cycle in relation to the Mazda 3 III. The difference at the level of 1 l is not significant. At the same time in the long term it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

5.8 > 7.3 l
The Peugeot consumes 1.5 l fewer petrol running around the town than the Mazda. The difference at the level of 21 % is quite noticeable in daily use of the ride. But, in a long run it will bring you significant savings. Bear in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on how you drive
38

Trunk capacity

419 > 365 l
If you need a car by which you could set of for cruises, which could load more luggage , decide to buy the Peugeot. The Mazda has by 15 percent smaller boot than the Mazda so you would be able to load one bag less. When it comes to the boot also check its dimensions which have considerable impact on loading capability .
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d. The engine of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 63 % worst result compared with the Peugeot.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 4.8 l
19

Range

1,152 > 879 km
19

Fuel tank

54 > 51 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d which can contain 6 % more fuel compared with the Mazda 3 III Hatchback. The medium fuel tank capacity in the small family cars segment, which is represented by the Peugeot 308 II, equals 52 liters, whereas in small family cars segment (represented by the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual) it equals 52 liters.
12

Urban range

914 > 680 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,359 > 1,063 km
1

Height

1,456 > 1,450 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Peugeot 308 II, which is by 6 millimeters higher than the Mazda, would be better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

861 > 928 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,800 kg 1,722 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK