The Renault 11 Hatchback 1.1 48HP manual quite much loses with the Mazda 3 III Hatchback in the field of horsepower having them by 117 horsepowers less. Therefore the engine of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual ,unlike the Renault 11, provides lots of power and rapid acceleration.
The Mazda uses 18 percent fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Renault 11 Hatchback 1.1 48HP manual. The difference at the level of 1.2 l is not very appreciable. Nevertheless within some time it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
When you step on the gas pedal and you start speeding up fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will notice it better driving the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual as it has 161 % more torque in comparison to the Renault. Presented cars vary so much that only driving the Mazda 3 III Hatchback you will have a pleasurable sensations of getting pinned back in the seat when the car starts to accelerate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Renault 11 Hatchback speeds up by 13.2 s slower in comparison tohis rival. The
huge difference between these two cars distinctly shows better car of
The Renault 11 has 72 kilometers per hour smaller top velocity in relation to the Mazda 3 III, because of which covering a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference may be perceptible during running over on the road without speed limits to the car of Mazda brand advantage.
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Mazda 3 III is 391 millimeters wider when compared to the Renault. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The Mazda 3 III has 9 % longer wheelbase in relation to Renault 11 Hatchback 1.1 48HP manual. Thanks to this the Mazda 3 III is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
Number of gears
The Mazda 3 III has a one more
gear than the
Renault 11 Hatchback. Usually this
extra speed is a very
tall one so that the previous
speeds can be shorter in order to
allow increased acceleration in the
lower speeds. One more speed as well will result in smaller
fuel consumption and CO2 output.
Ground clearance is defined as the gap between the vehicle body and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Mazda that has 33 % higher ride height than the Renault 11 Hatchback 1.1 48HP manual. For this reason the Mazda will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and high curbs in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual.
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback has 889 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity than the Renault 11. The difference is relatively big. Consequently the Mazda should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand bigger cubic capacity means worst fuel consumption.
Maximum load capacity
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is 10 percent longer when compared to the Renault 11. Long cars have more interior space and in most cases provide more storage space. Although the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual occurs to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Renault may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Mazda, which is by 3 % higher than the Renault, would be better option for you. However, these two cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.