Mazda 323 VI F, model available from 1998 to 2003.
It has 1.3 i 16V 73HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2003.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.
Suzuki Baleno II Hatchback, model available from 1998 to 2002.
It has 1.3 i 16V 86HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2002.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.
13 reasons for Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Baleno II Hatchback 1.3 i 16V 86HP manual
Reasons for
38
Trunk capacity
302 >
209 l
The Mazda 323 VI F features 93 liters
larger boot
than the Suzuki Baleno II Hatchback 1.3 i 16V 86HP manual.
Such a difference is big
so it will is relevant to the comfort of the
vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that
the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual has 23 percent
bigger
boot size than the average in its class. More spacious
luggage compartment will be useful during family
journeys as well as while
daily car’s usage.
The top speed of the Mazda 323 VI F is greater in comparison to of the Suzuki by 4 kilometers per hour, which allows the Mazda 323 VI to cover faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual is widther only by 1 percent in relation to the Suzuki and is not really important. The medium for the „C” segment amounts to around 1,703 millimeters and is by 2 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Mazda 323 VI.
The Mazda 323 VI has 219 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki. Thanks to this the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
The Mazda has by 25 cc greater cubic capacity in comparison to the Suzuki Baleno II Hatchback. This may have a little impact when it comes to car's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
The Mazda 323 VI F is 332 mm longer when compared to the Suzuki. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Mazda preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mazda 323 VI will be better driven but the Suzuki will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .
It is beyond the question that the five-door Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual is more usable and if you regularly travel with more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Suzuki Baleno II Hatchback 1.3 i 16V 86HP manual generally look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Suzuki Baleno II might be better one.
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual, which is by 1 percent higher than the Suzuki Baleno II Hatchback, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
2 reasons for Suzuki Baleno II Hatchback 1.3 i 16V 86KM manual in comparison to Mazda 323 VI F 1.3 i 16V 73HP manual
Reasons for
135
Maximal power
86 >
73 hp
The horsepower of the Suzuki Baleno II is by 18 % grater when compared to the Mazda. Because the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
The Mazda 323 VI F is worst that the Suzuki Baleno II in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Suzuki is able to take by 2 % more fuel compared with its contender.