Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual vs Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual

Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

13 reasons for

Mazda 5 II, model available from 2010.
It has 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP diesel engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

12 reasons for

Volkswagen Sharan I, model available from 1995 to 2010.
It has 2.0 TDI 140HP diesel engine produced from 1995 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual
Mazda

13 reasons for Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143KM manual in comparison to Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

143 > 140 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda is 3 horsepowers bigger when compared to the Volkswagen. Because the difference is small this should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
112

Average consumption

5.9 > 6.6 l
The Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual burns up 0.7 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual. The Mazda 5 II, which is classified in „minivan” class consumes by 0.6 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 6.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

359 > 310 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual is 16 percent greater than the Volkswagen Sharan I. Because of this, the Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual will accelerate somewhat better and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Mazda 5 II will burn up on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
56

Urban consumption

7.1 > 8.1 l
The fuel consumption of the Mazda 5 II is 1 liter smaller when compared to the Volkswagen. Despite the difference is little, in the long run it can cause that the car would be significantly cheper to exploate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11 > 12.2 s
The Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower compared to the Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual. The difference in the amount of 1.2 s is quite low and for that reason it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration when selecting the better one of compared cars.
33

Top speed

196 > 195 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Mazda 5 II is greater as compared to this of the Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 1 percent is not big and is not realy noticable in daily use.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.4 > 5.7 l
22

Width

1,988 > 1,810 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mazda 5 II is 10 percent wider than the Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,968 cc
The Mazda 5 II has by 30 cubic centimeters larger engine size in relation to the Volkswagen Sharan I. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not vary much.
4

Rear track

1,518 > 1,505 mm
1

Model release date

2010 > 1995
0

Maximal power RPM

3,500 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,531 > 1,509 mm

Volkswagen

12 reasons for Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140KM manual in comparison to Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

254 > 157 l
With more trunk space the Volkswagen Sharan I will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional one compared with the Mazda 5 II. If the capacity of the boot is important to you, the Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual will be better to choose because it is around 62 percent larger than the trunk of its contender.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,609 > 779 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,895 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is produced affects an engine’s performance. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always good to see a torque graph.
19

Range

1,061 > 984 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 60 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Volkswagen Sharan I which can comprise 17 % more fuel than the Mazda 5 II. The average fuel tank size in the van segment, which is represented by the Volkswagen Sharan I, equals 70 liters, whereas in minivan class (represented by the Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual) it equals 57 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,826 > 2,750 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Volkswagen has 3 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Mazda. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Volkswagen Sharan I should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

843 > 822 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,228 > 1,111 km
8

Maximum load capacity

788 > 615 kg
6

Length

4,619 > 4,585 mm
The Volkswagen is 1 percent longer than the Mazda 5 II. The length of the vehicle is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Volkswagen very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Volkswagen Sharan I will be better driven but the Mazda 5 II will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length .
1

Height

1,728 > 1,614 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Volkswagen, which is by 7 % higher than the Mazda, would be better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Payload

2,430 > 2,151 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda 5 II 2.0 MZR-CD 143HP manual Volkswagen Sharan I 2.0 TDI 140HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 1995
    Facelifting no no
    Class minivan van
    Payload 2,151 kg 2,430 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK