Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual vs Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual

Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

16 reasons for

Mazda 6 II Hatchback, model available from 2007 to 2012.
It has 1.8 MZR 120HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Renault Laguna II Hatchback, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 1.8 16V 120HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual
Mazda

16 reasons for Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120KM manual in comparison to Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 7.7 l
The Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual burns up 1.1 l less fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Renault. The Mazda 6 II Hatchback, being palced in „D” segment uses by 1.1 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.7 l.
38

Trunk capacity

510 > 430 l
With more trunk space the Mazda 6 II Hatchback will have much more room for transporting things and be more usefull one compared with the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual. If the size of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Mazda 6 II Hatchback will be better to choose because it is about 19 percent more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
22

Width

1,780 > 1,768 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Mazda is 1 % wider when compared to the Renault. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

941 > 933 km
8

Engine capacity

1,798 > 1,784 cc
The Mazda 6 II has 14 cubic centimeters larger engine displacement in comparison to the Renault. As the difference is not big, the Mazda should accelerate slightly dynamically, if other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,687 > 4,576 mm
The Mazda is 111 mm longer in relation to the Renault Laguna II. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Mazda will be better driven but the Renault Laguna II will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,539 > 1,481 mm
1

Model release date

2007 > 2001
Production of the older vehicle started 6 years prior to its rival hence we may expect that this vehicle gives way to Mazda 6 II Hatchback because it has not so advanced solutions used.
1

Height

1,434 > 1,427 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Mazda 6 II, which is by 7 millimeters higher than the Renault, is appropriate option for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Payload

1,886 > 1,866 kg
0

Front track

1,539 > 1,525 mm
0

End of model sale

2012 > 2007
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

50 > 55 %
0

Curb weight

1,400 > 1,294 kg

Renault

5 reasons for Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120KM manual in comparison to Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.7 > 11.6 s
A little difference that amounts to 8 percent indicates that the Mazda 6 II is the worst car of these two . In the „mid-size class, being represented by the Mazda 6 II Hatchback, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 9.9 s and is by 17 % higher than this of Mazda car.
33

Top speed

203 > 200 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual is greater as compared to this of the Mazda 6 II which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 2 % is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 64 l
The Mazda 6 II is worst that the Renault in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual is able to take by 11 percent more fuel in relation to the Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,746 > 2,685 mm
The Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual has 2 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual. Thanks to this the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
8

Maximum load capacity

575 > 490 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda 6 II Hatchback 1.8 MZR 120HP manual Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.8 16V 120HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2001
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload 1,886 kg 1,866 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK