Thanks to 73 % more torque, the engine of the Mercedes does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Mazda 6 III Estate. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
The fuel consumption of the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual is 0.6 l smaller in relation to the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long run it can cause that the vehicle would be considerably cheper to use.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual can reach the
speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared with the Mercedes C-Class W204. The
difference at the level of
1 % is
is slightly to the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting advantage, however, it should
not be vitally taken into
consideration for selecting the better one of compared
The top speed possible to be reached by the Mercedes C-Class W204 is greater compared with this of the Mazda by 3 km/h, which allows the Mercedes to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 kilometers per hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
Maximal torque RPM
Such a big difference stems from the fact that both compared cars have various engines. The Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting is equipped with the diesel engine, the Mazda 6 III has the petrol engine. Because of the fact that these cars has different types of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
The Mercedes has 7 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Mazda 6 III Estate. Therefore the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
The Mercedes has by 7 % bigger engine capacity when compared to the Mazda. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values does not differ much.