Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual vs Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual

Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

13 reasons for

Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting, model available from 2006.
It has 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP diesel engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Mazda 6 III Estate, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual
Mercedes

13 reasons for Mercedes Klasa C W204 Kombi T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136KM manual in comparison to Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

362 > 209 Nm
Thanks to 73 % more torque, the engine of the Mercedes does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Mazda 6 III Estate. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6.4 > 7 l
The fuel consumption of the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual is 0.6 l smaller in relation to the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long run it can cause that the vehicle would be considerably cheper to use.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 9.6 s
The Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower compared with the Mercedes C-Class W204. The difference at the level of 1 % is is slightly to the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting advantage, however, it should not be vitally taken into consideration for selecting the better one of compared vehicles.
33

Top speed

209 > 206 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Mercedes C-Class W204 is greater compared with this of the Mazda by 3 km/h, which allows the Mercedes to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 3 kilometers per hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,595 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
Such a big difference stems from the fact that both compared cars have various engines. The Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting is equipped with the diesel engine, the Mazda 6 III has the petrol engine. Because of the fact that these cars has different types of engines, comparing this characteristic is pointless.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 4.7 l
15

Wheelbase

2,759 > 2,752 mm
The Mercedes has 7 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Mazda 6 III Estate. Therefore the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

2,143 > 1,998 cc
The Mercedes has by 7 % bigger engine capacity when compared to the Mazda. This play a little role as far as acceleration is concerned, as both values does not differ much.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Maximal power RPM

2,800 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,155 > 1,980 kg
0

Front overhang

773 > 955 mm
0

Rear overhang

1,069 > 1,101 mm

Mazda

7 reasons for Mazda 6 III Kombi 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145KM manual in comparison to Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

145 > 136 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual is 9 horsepowers bigger in comparison to the Mercedes C-Class W204. As the difference is small it should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
38

Trunk capacity

506 > 485 l
If you need a car by which you could set of for travels, which could contain more luggage , decide to buy the Mazda 6 III Estate. The Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual is equiped with by 21 l less capable trunk in relation to the Mercedes so you would be able to put in the trunk one bag less. Examining the trunk pay attention to its dimensions which have considerable effect on loading capability .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,649 > 1,500 l
22

Width

1,845 > 1,774 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda is 4 percent wider in comparison to the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
6

Length

4,806 > 4,606 mm
The Mazda is 4 percent longer in relation to the Mercedes C-Class W204. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases provide more storage space. Although the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual occurs to be better for families or persons who love the idea of convenient rides, the Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual may appeal to the young as it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2006
Production of the older car started much more earlier than Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual thus man may suspect that this car has not so advanced technologies applied.
1

Height

1,475 > 1,459 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Mazda 6 III Estate, which is by 16 mm higher than the Mercedes C-Class W204, would be appropriate pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much observable.

Cars specifications

Mercedes C-Class W204 Estate T204 Facelifting 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 136HP manual Mazda 6 III Estate 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 145HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,804 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2012
    Facelifting yes no
    Code name W204 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK