Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 vs Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

14 reasons for

Mercedes GLA, model available from 2013.
It has 200 156HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual
Mazda

15 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 156 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of us pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mazda CX-5 which has by 3 % horsepower more in comparison to the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual, which makes this car slightly quicker. With more horsepower the Mazda CX-5 should as well provide somewhat more flexiblility in specific gears.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,804 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The width of the Mazda CX-5 is larger only by 2 percent compared with the Mercedes and is not really relevant. The average for the „compact SUV” class amounts to 1,797 millimeters and is by 46 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mazda.
19

Range

848 > 847 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 51 l
The Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual loses with the Mazda CX-5 in the field of fuel tank size. The Mazda is able to carry by 10 % more fuel compared with its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,697 mm
Mazda CX-5 has 3 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

691 > 633 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,595 cc
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 has 403 cc larger cubic capacity in relation to the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual. The difference is relatively large. Consequently the Mazda should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine capacity usually results in worst fuel economy.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,803 > 1,404 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,417 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 3 percent longer when compared to the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual. Long cars more of passenger space and also have bigger trunk. Although the Mazda CX-5 seems to be better for families or persons who love the idea of convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mercedes may appeal to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,560 mm
1

Height

1,668 > 1,493 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference that amounts to 12 % in favor of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is little and does not matter much.
0

Payload

2,000 > 1,916 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

726 > 700 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,567 mm
0

Curb weight

1,500 > 1,391 kg

Mercedes

14 reasons for Mercedes GLA 200 156KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.9 > 6.4 l
The Mercedes GLA burns up 8 % less in the combined cycle than the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 0.5 l is not significant. Nevertheless in the long run it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

252 > 207 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mercedes is 45 newton meters greater than the Mazda. Because of this, the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual will accelerate slightly swifter and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Mercedes GLA will burn up less fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.9 > 10.5 s
The Mercedes GLA accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 8.9 s, which is 15 percent faster in comparison to the Mazda CX-5. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a vehicle.
33

Top speed

215 > 197 km/h
The top speed of the Mercedes is greater in comparison to this of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 18 km/h is not big and is not realy noticable in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,245 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly indicates that the winner is is this of the Mercedes. The engine of the Mazda CX-5 achieves its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 69 % worst result compared with the Mercedes GLA.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 5.8 l
11

Extra-urban range

1,042 > 966 km
8

Maximum load capacity

525 > 500 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual may have more advanced technologies.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

75 > 50 kg
0

Front overhang

906 > 950 mm
0

Rear overhang

813 > 907 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg 1,404 kg
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK