Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

18 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
Mazda

18 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 117 hp
The Mazda is equipped with petrol which delivers by 43 more horsepower than the the engine of the Mitsubishi, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It should be googd car for drivers who would like to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

207 > 152 Nm
The Mazda CX-5 has 36 percent more torque than the Mitsubishi. The difference at this level is quite big, so that the Mazda will be seeding up perceptibly better.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 11.4 s
A little difference in the amount of 8 percent suggests that the Mitsubishi ASX is the worst car of these two compared. In the „compact SUV segment, being represented by the Mitsubishi ASX SUV, the medium acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 0.5 s higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 418 l
The Mazda CX-5 has 85 liters more capable trunk compared with the Mitsubishi ASX. Such a difference is big and it will affect the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Mazda CX-5 has 13 percent bigger trunk capacity than the average in its class. More spacious boot will be useful during family traveling as well as during daily driving.
33

Top speed

197 > 183 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Mazda CX-5 is greater compared with the Mitsubishi by 14 kilometers/hour, which allows the Mazda CX-5 to overcome faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 14 kilometers/hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,770 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is 73 millimeters wider when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,676 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Mazda CX-5 has 24 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda CX-5 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 have a higher gear count compared with the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual which means that Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 would achieve better speeding up and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not feel the difference.
9

Ground clearance

209 > 171 mm
Ground clearance is a crucial factor in many relevant characteristics of a vehicle. Ride height is very important for SUV vehicles though all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Mazda CX-5 has 38 mm higher clearance when compared with the Mitsubishi ASX. Apart from easier mobility in rough terrain, the Mazda will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,589 cc
The engine displacement of the Mazda CX-5 is by 26 % bigger in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. For this reason the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mazda will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,803 > 1,102 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,296 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 241 mm longer in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Mazda will be better driven but the Mitsubishi ASX SUV will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,525 mm
1

Model release date

2011 > 2010
The difference in debut day between compared cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace what may cause that the Mazda may feature more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,668 > 1,615 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mazda CX-5, which is by 3 percent higher than the Mitsubishi ASX, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Payload

2,000 > 1,869 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,525 mm
0

Curb weight

1,500 > 1,240 kg

Mitsubishi

10 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.2 > 6.4 l
The Mitsubishi ASX SUV consumes 3 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mazda. The Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual, being palced in „small off-road 4x4” class consumes by 1.3 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

7.8 > 7.9 l
The Mitsubishi ASX SUV uses 1 percent fewer in city traffic in comparison to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 0.1 l is not significant in daily use of the ride, however, during the period of a year it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always good to see a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 5.8 l
19

Fuel tank

62 > 56 l
The Mazda CX-5 loses with the Mitsubishi in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Mitsubishi ASX is able to store by 11 % more fuel in relation to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4.
19

Range

1,050 > 848 km
12

Urban range

808 > 691 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,260 > 966 km
8

Maximum load capacity

625 > 500 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

746 > 726 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg 1,102 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK