Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Mazda

17 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of car fans take into account at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Mazda CX-5 which has by 39 % more horsepower when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. Consequently the Mazda CX-5 can achieve higher top speed. Due to more horsepower the Mazda CX-5 will as well provide better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

207 > 190 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is 9 % greater than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. For this reason, the Mazda CX-5 will accelerate somewhat swifter and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Mazda CX-5 will burn up on average less fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 11.3 s
The Mazda CX-5 accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h in 10.5 s, which is 0.8 s less in comparison to the Nissan. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 438 l
The boot of the Mazda CX-5 is only 65 liters bigger than the Nissan Qashqai II. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both cars have similar trunk space.
33

Top speed

197 > 183 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is higher in comparison to this of the Nissan Qashqai II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 14 km/h is not big and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,800 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is 43 mm wider when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 54 l
The Nissan Qashqai II is worst that the Mazda CX-5 in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Mazda CX-5 is able to carry by 4 % more fuel than its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,644 mm
The Mazda CX-5 has 56 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan Qashqai II. Thanks to this the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,198 cc
The engine size of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is by 67 % bigger in comparison to the Nissan. In a consequence the Nissan Qashqai II will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,803 > 1,199 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,380 mm
The Mazda is 157 millimeters longer in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Long cars more of passenger space and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Mazda CX-5 occurs to be better choice for families or drivers who value comfortable rides, the Nissan may be more appropriate to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,563 mm
1

Height

1,668 > 1,590 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 5 % to the advantage of the Mazda CX-5 is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

2,000 > 1,860 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

726 > 679 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,564 mm
0

Curb weight

1,500 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

11 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 6.4 l
The Nissan Qashqai II consumes 13 % fewer in the mixed cycle than the Mazda CX-5. The difference at the level of 0.8 l is not very appreciable. Nevertheless within some time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 7.9 l
The Nissan Qashqai II consumes of 1 l petrol less in the city in relation to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4. The Nissan Qashqai II, as a representative of small off-road 4x4 segment, consumes of 2.7 l per 100 km fewer than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” segment is 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always recommended to check a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.8 l
19

Range

982 > 848 km
12

Urban range

797 > 691 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 966 km
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 500 kg
1

Model release date

2014 > 2011
Because of the fact that the Mazda CX-5 was unveiled only 3 years before the Nissan Qashqai II, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Nissan Qashqai II may feature a bit more modern solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

75 > 50 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg 1,199 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK