Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 vs Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Opel Mokka, model available from 2012.
It has 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual
Mazda

13 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 140 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda CX-5 is 20 hp grater in comparison to the Opel. Because the difference is little it should not affect the vehicles performance to a large extent.
59

Maximal torque

207 > 200 Nm
The Mazda CX-5 has 4 percent more torque when compared to the Opel Mokka. Although the vast majority of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it informs the best how a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is insensible so you probably will not feel the difference.
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 354 l
With more boot size the Mazda CX-5 will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull one compared with the Opel Mokka. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Mazda CX-5 will be better to choose as it is about 42 percent more spacious than the trunk of its rival.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,622 > 783 l
33

Top speed

197 > 193 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Mazda is higher in comparison to this of the Opel Mokka which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 2 % is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,777 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mazda CX-5 is 66 millimeters wider when compared to the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 54 l
The Opel Mokka loses with the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Mazda CX-5 is able to take by 2 liters more fuel compared with its rival.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,551 mm
Mazda CX-5 has 149 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Opel. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,365 cc
The engine size of the Mazda is by 46 % larger in relation to the Opel Mokka. As a result the Opel Mokka will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,537 > 4,278 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 6 percent longer than the Opel Mokka. Long cars are more spacious and also have bigger trunk. Although the Mazda CX-5 occurs to be better option for families or those who value convenient driving, the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual may be more appropriate to singles as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,542 mm
1

Height

1,668 > 1,658 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Mazda, which is by 1 percent higher than the Opel Mokka, would be appropriate choice for you. However, these two cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,540 mm

Opel

8 reasons for Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.9 > 6.4 l
The Opel consumes 8 percent fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Mazda CX-5. The difference at the level of 0.5 l is not realy noticeable. At the same time in the long term it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.9 > 10.5 s
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 can reach the speed of 100Km/h relatively slower in relation to the Opel Mokka. The difference in the amount of 6 % is quite little and it should not be strongly taken into as important when selecting the better one of presented cars.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,850 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced clearly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is the one of the Opel Mokka. The engine of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 achieves its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions per minute which is by 2,155 revolutions/minute worst result compared with the Opel Mokka.
19

Range

915 > 848 km
1

Model release date

2012 > 2011
Because of the fact that the Mazda CX-5 was introduced only 1 year earlier than the Opel Mokka, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Opel may have a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
0

Maximal roof load

75 > 50 kg
0

Front overhang

945 > 950 mm
0

Rear overhang

779 > 907 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK