Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 vs Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

1 reason for

Suzuki Jimny Cabrio, model available from 1998.
It has 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2005.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4
Mazda

17 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 80 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of car fans pay the greatest attention to. As far as the two compared cars are concerned, it is the Mazda CX-5, which has by 80 more horsepower than the Suzuki Jimny Cabrio, which makes this vehicle really better in terms of top speed. Due to more horsepower the Mazda CX-5 will as well provide considerably more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

207 > 104 Nm
The Mazda has 99 % more torque when compared to the Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4. The difference at this level is quite big, what means that the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 will be seeding up significantly faster.
33

Top speed

197 > 140 km/h
The Suzuki has by 41 % lower maximum speed than the Mazda, as a result of which covering a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will need more time. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on highways to the car of Mazda brand advantage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered affects an engine’s performance. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to check a torque performance graph.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,600 mm
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin as well as stability while driving. The width of the Mazda CX-5 is larger only by 15 % in relation to the Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4 and is not really important. The medium for the „mini 4x4” segment amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 % smaller than the same feature of the Mazda CX-5.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 40 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 which can carry by 16 liters more petrol than the Suzuki Jimny.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,259 mm
The wheelbase of a car means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mazda CX-5 has 441 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Suzuki Jimny Cabrio. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda CX-5 should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 has only one extra gear in relation to the Suzuki Jimny. Sometimes this additional gear is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous gears can be narrower in order to give better performance in the lower gears. One more speed also will casuse fuel consumption and CO2 output.
9

Ground clearance

209 > 188 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the minimum distance between the vehicle underbody and the ground. From these two cars, it is the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 that has 11 % higher ground clearance when compared with the Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4. This is why the Mazda will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the Mazda CX-5.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,299 cc
The engine size of the Mazda CX-5 is by 54 % greater when compared to the Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4. For this reason the Suzuki will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,537 > 3,645 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 892 mm longer in relation to the Suzuki. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the Mazda CX-5 seems to be better pick for families or those who value convenient driving, the Suzuki may appeal to women because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,365 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 is more usable and if you regularly carry more than one passenger then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Suzuki Jimny Cabrio generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Suzuki Jimny may be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2011 > 1998
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Payload

2,000 > 1,418 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,355 mm

Suzuki

1 reason for Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
1

Height

1,670 > 1,668 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 2 millimeters to the advantage of the Suzuki Jimny is not big and does not matter much.

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 Suzuki Jimny Cabrio 1.3 i 16V 4WD 80HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 1998
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK