Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Mercedes GLA, model available from 2013.
It has 200 156HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual
Mazda

17 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 156 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda CX-5 is by 9 horsepowers grater in relation to the Mercedes GLA. While the difference is not big it should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 5.9 l
The Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.1 l fewer in the combined cycle when compared to the Mercedes GLA. The difference at the level of 0.1 l is not significant. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 7.9 l
The fuel consumption of the Mazda is 8 percent better than the Mercedes GLA. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long term it may cause that the vehicle would be noticably less expensive to exploate.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,804 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is larger by 39 millimeters than the Mercedes GLA and is not really important. The medium for the „compact SUV” class is approximately 1,797 mm and is by 46 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mazda.
19

Range

933 > 847 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 51 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Mazda CX-5 which can hold 10 percent more fuel compared with the Mercedes GLA. The average fuel container size in the small off-road 4x4 segment, from which the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual comes from, amounts to 61 l, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Mercedes) it equals 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,697 mm
Mazda CX-5 has 3 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to the Mercedes GLA. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

747 > 633 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,098 > 1,042 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,595 cc
The engine capacity of the Mazda CX-5 is by 403 cc bigger when compared to the Mercedes GLA. As a result the Mercedes will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,803 > 1,404 kg
6

Length

4,537 > 4,417 mm
The Mazda is 3 percent longer than the Mercedes. Long cars more of passenger space and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual seems to be better option for families or persons who love the idea of comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mercedes GLA may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,560 mm
1

Height

1,668 > 1,493 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Mazda CX-5, which is by 12 percent higher than the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual, would be appropriate choice for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Payload

1,930 > 1,916 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,567 mm
0

Curb weight

1,420 > 1,391 kg

Mercedes

13 reasons for Mercedes GLA 200 156KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

252 > 209 Nm
The Mercedes has 43 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. Even though the vast majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it presents the best how a car acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is insensible so the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.9 > 9.2 s
The Mercedes GLA can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 8.9 s, which is 0.3 s faster when compared to the Mazda. But the difference is not as much significant to be taken into consideration when buying a ride.
33

Top speed

215 > 200 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual is greater than the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual by 8, which allows the Mercedes GLA to cover faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 15 km/h is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,245 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is produced clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Mercedes GLA. The engine of the Mazda CX-5 reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 69 percent lower compared with the Mercedes GLA.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 5.1 l
8

Maximum load capacity

525 > 510 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
Because of the fact that the Mazda CX-5 was launched only 2 years prior to the Mercedes GLA, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Mercedes GLA may feature a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

75 > 50 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

700 > 691 kg
0

Front overhang

906 > 950 mm
0

Rear overhang

813 > 907 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg 1,404 kg
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK