Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

20 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
Mazda

20 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 147 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda CX-5 is 18 hp grater when compared to the Mitsubishi. As the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance considerably.
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 7.7 l
The Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.9 l less fuel in the combined cycle than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. The difference at the level of 1.9 l will be quite very appreciable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long period of time it would give a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

209 > 197 Nm
The Mazda has 6 % more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. Even though the majority of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a car, it presents the best how a vehicle is speeding up. In this case the difference is little so the difference will not be much noticeable.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 9.7 l
The Mazda CX-5 uses 2.4 l less petrol while driving inside city in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. The difference at the level of 25 % is quite significant in everyday use of the automobile. What is more, in a long run it will bring you significant savings. Keep in mind that fuel consumption may change depending on your driving style
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.2 > 10.8 s
A small difference that amounts to 15 percent indicates that the Mitsubishi is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „small off-road 4x4 segment, being represented by the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, the average acceleration to 100km/h is 10.9 s and is by 0.1 s lower than this of Mitsubishi car.
33

Top speed

200 > 184 km/h
The top speed of the Mazda CX-5 is greater as compared to this of the Mitsubishi which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 16 kilometers/hour is small and is imperceptible in everyday use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is produced affects an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always worth to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.1 > 6.3 l
22

Width

1,843 > 1,799 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mazda CX-5 is 2 percent wider in relation to the Mitsubishi. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

933 > 800 km
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,680 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better car's weight distribution. Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual has 20 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Mazda should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

747 > 619 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,098 > 952 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda CX-5 have a higher speed count in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III which means that Mazda CX-5 would have better speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,997 cc
The Mazda CX-5 has 1 cc greater engine size in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Mazda should accelerate slightly dynamically, if other paramerters are equal.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,803 > 1,600 kg
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,540 mm
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,540 mm
0

Front overhang

950 > 953 mm
0

Rear overhang

907 > 1,029 mm

Mitsubishi

10 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

59 > 56 l
In this category it is the Mitsubishi Outlander III which can hold 5 % more fuel in relation to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. The medium fuel tank size in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the Mitsubishi Outlander III comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in mini 4x4 segment (represented by the Mazda CX-5) it equals 61 liters.
9

Ground clearance

216 > 209 mm
Ground clearance is the space between the vehicle underbody and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV that has 7 millimeters higher ride height in comparison to the Mazda CX-5. For this reason the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual will cope better with rough terrain and high curbs in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV.
8

Maximum load capacity

630 > 510 kg
6

Length

4,654 > 4,537 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III is 3 % longer in relation to the Mazda CX-5. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually provide bigger trunk. While the Mitsubishi occurs to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate comfortable rides, the Mazda CX-5 may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Model release date

2012 > 2011
Because of the fact that the Mazda CX-5 was introduced only 1 year prior to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Mitsubishi may have slightly more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,682 > 1,668 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 14 millimeters to the advantage of the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV is not big and does not matter much.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,065 > 1,930 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

750 > 691 kg
0

Curb weight

1,440 > 1,420 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg 1,600 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK