The horsepower of the Mazda CX-5 is 18 percent bigger when compared to the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual. As the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual uses 2 percent fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Opel. The difference at the level of 0.1 l is not significant. However within some time it can generate a real savings.
Maximum torque of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is 5 % greater than the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual. For this reason, the Mazda CX-5 will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Mazda CX-5 will use fever fuel for every 100 km.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Opel Mokka speeds up relatively slower in relation to the Mazda CX-5. The
difference in the amount of
0.7 s is
is slightly to the Mazda CX-5 advantage, however, it should
not be vitally taken by you into
consideration for buying one of compared
The Mazda CX-5 has 149 l
in relation to the Opel Mokka.
Such a difference is quite big
so it will distinctly matters in terms
of the comfort of the
car’s usage. It is worth to note that
the Mazda CX-5 has
trunk size than the average in its class. More spacious
boot will be useful during family
traveling and also while
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum velocity of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is higher as compared to this of the Opel Mokka which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 4 % is little and is imperceptible in daily use.
Width of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is widther by 4 percent in relation to the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual and is not really important. The average for the „mini 4x4” segment is 1,797 millimeters and is by 3 % larger than the width of the Mazda CX-5.
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank size is Mazda CX-5 that is able to take by 4 % more petrol compared with the Opel Mokka.
The Mazda has 149 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to Opel Mokka. As a result the Mazda is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
The engine displacement of the Mazda is by 46 % greater in relation to the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual. As a result the Opel will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
The Mazda CX-5 is 259 mm longer than the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Mazda CX-5 preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Opel Mokka will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Mazda, which is by 1 % higher than the Opel Mokka 1.4 Turbo ECOTEC 140HP manual, would be better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.