Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

20 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Suzuki SX4 II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 VVT 120HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
Mazda

20 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 120 hp
The Mazda CX-5 comes with petrol which makes by 45 more horsepower than the Suzuki SX4 II, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It seems to be better car for drivers who want to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

209 > 156 Nm
The Mazda CX-5 has 34 % more torque when compared to the Suzuki SX4 II. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual will be seeding up significantly better.
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 431 l
The boot of the Mazda is only 72 l bigger than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have similar trunk capacity.
33

Top speed

200 > 180 km/h
The top velocity of the Mazda is higher in comparison to this of the Suzuki SX4 II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 11 percent is little and is not realy noticable in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,005 > 4,400 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to check a torque graph.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,762 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Mazda CX-5 is larger only by 81 mm in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” segment equals to around 1,797 mm and is by 3 percent larger than the same attribute of the Mazda CX-5.
19

Range

933 > 909 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 50 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Mazda CX-5 that can take by 12 percent more fuel in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,595 mm
The Mazda CX-5 has 4 % longer wheelbase in relation to Suzuki. Thanks to this the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

747 > 735 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,098 > 1,042 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual has only one extra gear than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. Usually this extra gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous gears can be narrower in order to give better acceleration in the lower gears. One more speed as well will result in smaller fuel consumption and CO2 output.
9

Ground clearance

209 > 172 mm
Ground clearance means the minimum distance between the vehicle body and the ground. From these two cars, it is the Mazda that has 37 millimeters higher ride height in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II. This is why the Mazda CX-5 will cope better in difficult terrain and obstacles in the city. However, the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the car.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,587 cc
The Mazda CX-5 has 411 cc greater engine displacement in relation to the Suzuki. The difference is relatively substantia. Consequently the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand bigger engine size usually equals worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,537 > 4,295 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 6 percent longer when compared to the Suzuki. The length of the vehicle is important when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Mazda CX-5 preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Mazda CX-5 will be better driven ,however, the Suzuki SX4 II will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,505 mm
1

Height

1,668 > 1,574 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 94 mm in favor of the Mazda is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

1,930 > 1,735 kg
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,538 mm
0

Curb weight

1,420 > 1,090 kg

Suzuki

7 reasons for Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 5.8 l
The Suzuki burns up 0.2 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. The Suzuki, which is palced in „small off-road 4x4” class uses by 1.9 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 7.3 l
The fuel consumption of the Suzuki SX4 II is 0.5 l smaller than the Mazda. Despite the difference is small, in the long term it may make that the car would be considerably cheper to exploate.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.1 l
8

Maximum load capacity

645 > 510 kg
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
Because of the fact that the Mazda CX-5's production started only 2 years earlier than the Suzuki SX4 II, the gap between technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Suzuki SX4 II might have a bit more modern solutions used in it.
0

Front overhang

888 > 950 mm
0

Rear overhang

811 > 907 mm

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK