distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The Mazda MPV III 1.5 103HP manual is widther by 80 mm than the Toyota and is not really relevant. The medium for the „van” segment amounts to approximately 1,821 mm and is by 29 millimeters smaller than the width of the Mazda MPV III.
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Mazda MPV III 1.5 103HP manual that can carry 24 liters more fuel in relation to the Toyota. The medium fuel tank size in the van segment, which is represented by the Mazda MPV III, equals 70 liters, whereas in van segment (represented by the Toyota) it is 70 liters.
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mazda MPV III 1.5 103HP manual has 13 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Toyota Matrix II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Mazda MPV III should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Mazda MPV III 1.5 103HP manual is 496 mm longer than the Toyota Matrix II 1.8 132HP. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Mazda MPV III 1.5 103HP manual probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Mazda will be better driven ,however, the Toyota Matrix II 1.8 132HP will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Mazda MPV III, which is by 135 mm higher than the Toyota Matrix II 1.8 132HP, is appropriate pick for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.