The horsepower is a characteristic that most of car fans take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual that has by 110 more horsepower when compared to the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. As a result the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual can reach higher top speed. Having more horsepower the Nissan Murano I will as well provide seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
The Nissan Murano I consumes 7 percent less petrol in the city than the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. The Nissan, that comes from large SUV segment, consumes 3 l less petrol. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the large 4x4 class is 14.8 l, while the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual needs by 21 % less amount of fuel than the average.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Nissan Murano I accelerates to 100k\h by
quicker in comparison to the Mazda Tribute I. A noticable difference in
acceleration in favor of the Nissan Murano I will allow him to overtake much
quicker and avoid other obstacles.
The boot of the Nissan Murano I is 555 liters more spacious than the Mazda Tribute I. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual will be a way more useful. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Nissan Murano I is 5 percent wider than the Mazda Tribute I. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 gives way to the Nissan Murano I in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Nissan Murano I is able to carry by 24 liters more fuel than its rival.
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Nissan Murano I has 200 millimeters longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Nissan Murano I should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
The engine capacity of the Nissan Murano I is by 1,510 cc greater when compared to the Mazda. For this reason the Mazda Tribute I will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
Maximum load capacity
The Nissan Murano I is 9 % longer when compared to the Mazda Tribute I. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Nissan very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Nissan will be better driven ,however, the Mazda Tribute I will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
A Vee engine is a
developed construction of a
which as far as we are concerned is
a better choice. Engine of V type
in a car the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual
produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to
the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of
engime can house high numbers of
cylinders without significant growth in its
Better engine work and pleasant sound is
certainly to a Vee
Model release date
Given that the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 debuted only 2 years before the Nissan Murano I, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual might feature slightly more new solutions used in it.