Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

18 reasons for

Mercedes GLA, model available from 2013.
It has 200 156HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Mercedes

18 reasons for Mercedes GLA 200 156KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

156 > 115 hp
The Mercedes GLA has 36 percent more horsepower compared to Nissan. The Mercedes GLA will be distinctly more dynamically speed up thanks to grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also overtaking other vehicles should be much more easier for the Mercedes GLA equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

252 > 190 Nm
The Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual has 62 newton meters more torque in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. The difference at this level is quite big, what means that the Mercedes GLA will accelerate significantly faster.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.9 > 11.3 s
A small difference in the amount of 2.4 s indicates that the Nissan is the worst car of these two compared. In the „mini 4x4 class, being represented by the Nissan Qashqai II, the average acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 4 % higher than this of Nissan vehicle.
33

Top speed

215 > 183 km/h
The maximum speed of the ​​Mercedes GLA is greater than of the Nissan by 17, which allows the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual to cover quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 17 percent is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,245 > 2,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached determines an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, in order to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is always good to see a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.6 > 4.7 l
22

Width

1,804 > 1,800 mm
distance between left and right side of a car affects interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Mercedes is larger only by 4 mm in relation to the Nissan and is not really important. The medium for the „mini 4x4” class is 1,797 millimeters and is by 7 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mercedes.
15

Wheelbase

2,697 > 2,644 mm
The Mercedes has 2 % longer wheelbase when compared to Nissan. Consequently the Mercedes GLA is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,595 > 1,198 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Mercedes GLA is by 397 cc greater when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. In a consequence the Nissan Qashqai II will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mercedes GLA will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,404 > 1,199 kg
6

Length

4,417 > 4,380 mm
The Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual is 1 % longer in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. Long vehicles are more spacious and in most cases provide bigger trunk. Although the Mercedes occurs to be better option for families or those who value comfortable driving, the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
Add a comment
Buy the overpriced Benz over the 370z.. I dare you.
0

Payload

1,916 > 1,860 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

700 > 679 kg
0

Front track

1,567 > 1,564 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,391 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

11 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 5.9 l
The Nissan Qashqai II uses 5 percent less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mercedes GLA. The difference in the amount of 5 percent is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless in the long run it would give a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 7.9 l
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual consumes of 13 percent gasoline less in city traffic than the Mercedes GLA. The Nissan Qashqai II, which is classified in small off-road 4x4 class, burns up of 2.7 l/100Km fewer than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “mini 4x4” class equals to 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
19

Range

982 > 847 km
19

Fuel tank

54 > 51 l
The Mercedes loses with the Nissan Qashqai II in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Nissan Qashqai II is able to take by 3 l more fuel than its contender.
12

Urban range

797 > 633 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 1,042 km
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 525 kg
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,560 mm
1

Model release date

2014 > 2013
Given that the Mercedes's production began only 1 year prior to the Nissan Qashqai II, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Nissan may have slightly more modern solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,590 > 1,493 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Nissan, which is by 97 mm higher than the Mercedes GLA, would be appropriate option for you. However, these two cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,300 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,404 kg 1,199 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2013 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK