Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual vs Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

20 reasons for

Mercedes GLA, model available from 2013.
It has 200 156HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy dCi 90HP diesel engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual
Mercedes

20 reasons for Mercedes GLA 200 156KM manual in comparison to Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

156 > 90 hp
The Mercedes GLA has 73 percent more horsepower compared to Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. The Mercedes GLA will be distinctly more dynamically speed up owing to bigger horsepower. Also getting ahead of obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with stronger engine.
59

Maximal torque

252 > 220 Nm
The Mercedes has 15 % more torque in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. Even though a great deal of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it informs the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. In this case the difference is not really big so the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.9 > 13.1 s
The Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual accelerates to 100k\h by 4.2 s quicker when compared to the Renault Captur. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

215 > 171 km/h
The Renault has 26 percent lower top speed than the Mercedes GLA, as a result of which traveling a long distance, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, will need more time. The difference might be perceptible during riding on on the road without speed limits to the car of Mercedes brand advantage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,245 > 1,750 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of revolutions at which the maximum torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is good to analyze a torque graph.
22

Width

1,804 > 1,778 mm
Width of a car influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Mercedes GLA is widther by 1 percent compared with the Renault Captur and is not really worth considering. The average for the „mini 4x4” segment is approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 7 mm larger than the same feature of the Mercedes GLA.
19

Fuel tank

51 > 46 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Mercedes GLA which can take by 11 percent more petrol compared with the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,697 > 2,601 mm
The Mercedes GLA has 96 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. Thanks to this the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mercedes has a one additional gear than the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. Most often the additional gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous gears can be shorter to give better acceleration in the lower gears. One more speed as well affect lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

1,595 > 1,462 cc
The Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual has by 133 cubic centimeters larger engine size than the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. This may have a little impact when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not vary much.
6

Length

4,417 > 4,122 mm
The Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual is 7 percent longer in comparison to the Renault Captur. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Mercedes GLA preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Mercedes GLA will be better driven ,however, the Renault will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,560 > 1,514 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Payload

1,916 > 1,733 kg
0

Front track

1,567 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Curb weight

1,391 > 1,169 kg

Renault

11 reasons for Renault Captur Energy dCi 90KM manual in comparison to Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

3.8 > 5.9 l
The Renault Captur consumes 36 percent less amount of fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Mercedes GLA. The difference in the amount of 36 percent will be quite significant in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long term it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

4.2 > 7.9 l
The Renault Captur uses of 47 percent oil less while driving inside city in relation to the Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual. The Renault, which is classified in compact SUV segment, burns up of 5.4 l/100Km less than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l/100Km.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.4 > 4.6 l
19

Range

1,250 > 847 km
12

Urban range

1,071 > 633 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,324 > 1,042 km
8

Maximum load capacity

559 > 525 kg
1

Height

1,566 > 1,493 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Renault, which is by 73 millimeters higher than the Mercedes GLA, would be appropriate choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

867 > 906 mm
0

Rear overhang

650 > 813 mm

Cars specifications

Mercedes GLA 200 156HP manual Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,404 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK