Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4 vs Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4

Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

17 reasons for

Mercedes GLA, model available from 2013.
It has 250 211HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

14 reasons for

Toyota RAV4 IV, model available from 2013.
It has Valvematic 150 152HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4
Mercedes

17 reasons for Mercedes GLA 250 211KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

211 > 152 hp
The Mercedes GLA has 59 hp more horsepower compared to Toyota RAV4 IV. The Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4 will be distinctly better speed up thanks to grater horsepower. Also overtaking obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 7.2 l
The Mercedes GLA burns up 0.6 l less in the combined cycle when compared to the Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4. The difference at the level of 0.6 l is not perceptible. At the same time during a longer period of time it would allow you to make a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

352 > 193 Nm
The Mercedes GLA has 159 newton meters more torque in relation to the Toyota. Even though most of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it shows the best how a car acclerates. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is quite big thus the Mercedes GLA will give you better feeling of driving.
56

Urban consumption

8.3 > 9.3 l
The Mercedes GLA consumes 1 l fewer petrol while driving inside city in comparison to the Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4. The Mercedes, which comes from small off-road 4x4 segment, uses 1.3 l fewer fuel. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the mini 4x4 segment equals to 9.6 l, whereas the Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4 uses by 13 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.1 > 9.9 s
The Mercedes speeds up to 100k\h by 28 percent better in comparison to the Toyota. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Mercedes GLA will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

230 > 185 km/h
The maximum velocity of the Mercedes is greater as compared to this of the Toyota RAV4 IV which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 24 % is small and is imperceptible in daily use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,195 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Mercedes. The engine of the Toyota reaches its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 2,810 revolutions per minute lower than the Mercedes GLA.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.4 > 6 l
15

Wheelbase

2,697 > 2,662 mm
The Mercedes has 1 % longer wheelbase when compared to Toyota RAV4 IV. Therefore the Mercedes GLA is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,991 > 1,987 cc
The Mercedes has 4 cubic centimeters larger engine size in comparison to the Toyota. As the difference is not big, the Mercedes GLA should accelerate slightly better, of course if other paramerters are does not play a role.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a gentle drive in the city, it is good to have an automatic however the type of transmisison may have a considerable impact on fuel efficiency. Automatics may burn up more or less from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,200 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk height

707 > 490 mm
0

Front overhang

906 > 910 mm
0

Rear overhang

813 > 1,001 mm
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %

Toyota

14 reasons for Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
22

Width

1,845 > 1,804 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the Toyota RAV4 IV is larger only by 2 % than the Mercedes GLA and is not really important. The medium for the „compact SUV” class is approximately 1,797 mm and is by 3 % larger than the width of the Toyota RAV4 IV.
19

Range

833 > 758 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 51 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Toyota that can carry by 20 % more fuel in relation to the Mercedes GLA.
12

Urban range

645 > 602 km
11

Trunk length with seats up

953 > 805 mm
11

Extra-urban range

1,000 > 893 km
8

Maximum load capacity

540 > 485 kg
6

Length

4,572 > 4,417 mm
The Toyota RAV4 IV is 155 millimeters longer in relation to the Mercedes GLA. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Toyota will be better driven but the Mercedes will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,570 > 1,560 mm
1

Height

1,661 > 1,493 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4, which is by 11 percent higher than the Mercedes, would be appropriate pick for you. However, these two cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Payload

2,110 > 1,986 kg
0

Front track

1,570 > 1,567 mm
0

Curb weight

1,567 > 1,501 kg

Cars specifications

Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4 Toyota RAV4 IV Valvematic 150 152HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,804 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK