Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

17 reasons for

Mercedes M-Class W163, model available from 1997 to 2005.
It has 2.3 (230) 150HP petrol engine produced from 1998 to 2000.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Mercedes

17 reasons for Mercedes Klasa M W163 2.3 (230) 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

12.7 > 13.5 l
The Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4 burns up 6 % less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The difference at the level of 0.8 l is not perceptible. However during a longer period of time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

17.1 > 17.5 l
The fuel consumption of the Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4 is 0.4 l lower when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long term it may make that your car would be significantly cheper to utilize.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.3 > 12.8 s
A small difference amounts to 0.5 s suggests that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is somewhat beaten in this confrontation. In the „large SUV” segment, to which the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 2.3 s faster than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

177 > 175 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Mercedes is greater compared with of the Mitsubishi by 1, which allows the Mercedes M-Class W163 to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 1 percent is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,695 > 4,495 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is delivered determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always worth to check a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

9.8 > 10.9 l
22

Width

1,834 > 1,695 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The width of the Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4 is larger only by 139 millimeters in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I and is not really relevant. The average for the „large SUV” class equals to 1,866 mm and is by 32 millimeters smaller than the same feature of the Mercedes M-Class W163.
15

Wheelbase

2,819 > 2,725 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Mercedes M-Class W163 has 94 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Mercedes M-Class W163 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
10

Number of gears

5 > 4 gears
The Mercedes M-Class W163 have a higher gear count than the Mitsubishi which means that Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4 should achieve faster acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
9

Ground clearance

206 > 203 mm
Ground clearance means the minimum distance between the car underbody and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Mercedes M-Class W163 that has 3 millimeters higher ground clearance when compared with the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. For this reason the Mercedes will deal better in difficult terrain and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4.
4

Rear track

1,567 > 1,434 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

1997 > 1996
Given that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I was unveiled only 1 year before the Mercedes M-Class W163, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Mercedes M-Class W163 might feature a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,800 > 1,720 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 80 mm to the advantage of the Mercedes is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,565 > 1,422 mm
0

Rear overhang

928 > 1,057 mm
0

Curb weight

1,935 > 1,835 kg

Mitsubishi

13 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 150 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is 20 hp bigger in comparison to the Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4. While the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
59

Maximal torque

253 > 222 Nm
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I has 31 Nm more torque than the Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4. Although a large number of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it shows the best how fast a vehicle acclerates. In this case the difference is not really big so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

2,971 > 2,295 cc
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 has 29 % bigger cubic capacity than the Mercedes M-Class W163. The difference is relatively notable. Consequently the Mitsubishi should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine size usually results in worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,610 > 4,587 mm
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is 1 % longer than the Mercedes M-Class W163. Long cars have more interior space and in most cases have bigger trunk. While the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mercedes may be more appropriate to the young as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a developed construction of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which in our opinion} is wiser to choose one. Engine of V characteristic installed inside a car the Mitsubishi gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor may house high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is to driving fans to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For drivers who value less absorbing use of a car and don’t need complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend vehicles with automatic transmission. To those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift might be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,400 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2005
0

Front overhang

828 > 841 mm
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire profile

70 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Mercedes M-Class W163 2.3 (230) 150HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 2,647 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 1997 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Code name W163 -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK