Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual vs Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic

Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

22 reasons for

Mercedes SLK R171, model available from 2004 to 2011.
It has 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP petrol engine produced from 2004 to 2008.
Drive on the rear axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Mercedes SLK R170, model available from 1996 to 2004.
It has 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2000.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic, 5 speed gearbox.

Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic
Mercedes

22 reasons for Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163KM manual in comparison to Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.7 > 9.5 l
The Mercedes SLK R171 burns up 0.8 l fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mercedes SLK R170. The difference at the level of 0.8 l is not very appreciable. Nevertheless during a longer period of time it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

12.6 > 13.6 l
The fuel consumption of the Mercedes SLK R171 is 1 l smaller when compared to the Mercedes SLK R170. Despite the difference is small, in the long term it can cause that the vehicle would be noticably cheper to run.
38

Trunk capacity

334 > 145 l
The boot of the Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual is 130 % larger compared to the Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual will be a way more handy. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.
33

Top speed

230 > 227 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual is higher as compared to this of the Mercedes which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 1 % is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.3 > 6.8 l
22

Width

1,774 > 1,712 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The width of the Mercedes is larger only by 4 % in relation to the Mercedes SLK R170 and is not really important. The average for the „S” segment equals to approximately 1,792 mm and is by 1 % bigger than the width of the Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual.
19

Range

690 > 558 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 54 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank capacity is Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual which is able to hold by 13 % more fuel in comparison to the Mercedes.
15

Wheelbase

2,430 > 2,399 mm
Mercedes has 31 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Mercedes SLK R170. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
12

Urban range

476 > 390 km
11

Extra-urban range

923 > 757 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mercedes have a higher gear count compared with the Mercedes SLK R170 which means that Mercedes SLK R171 will achieve faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is quiet little and if you are not drag racer at a timed event you would not even observe the difference.
8

Maximum load capacity

315 > 235 kg
6

Length

4,082 > 3,990 mm
The Mercedes SLK R171 is 2 % longer in relation to the Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases provide bigger trunk. Although the Mercedes seems to be better option for families or drivers who value convenient rides, the Mercedes may appeal to women because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,539 > 1,471 mm
1

Model release date

2004 > 1996
Production of the older car commenced much more earlier than its contender and for this reason man may suspect that this vehicle gives way to Mercedes because it has not so modern parts applied.
1

Height

1,297 > 1,285 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Mercedes SLK R171, which is by 12 mm higher than the Mercedes, is appropriate choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Payload

1,701 > 1,587 kg
0

Front track

1,530 > 1,488 mm
0

End of model sale

2011 > 2004
0

Width with outside mirrors

1,973 > 1,946 mm
0

Curb weight

1,394 > 1,345 kg

Mercedes

10 reasons for Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193KM automat in comparison to Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

193 > 163 hp
The horsepower of the Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic is by 30 horsepowers bigger in comparison to the Mercedes SLK R171. While the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance considerably.
59

Maximal torque

282 > 242 Nm
The Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic has 40 newton meters more torque in relation to the Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual. Even though the vast majority of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it presents the best how fast a car acclerates. When it comes to compared cars the difference is quite small so the difference will not be much noticeable.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.3 > 7.9 s
A small difference that amounts to 0.6 s indicates that the Mercedes SLK R171 is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „sports cars segment, being represented by the Mercedes, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 7.2 s and is by 0.7 s higher than this of Mercedes car.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,495 > 2,995 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is delivered shows us how fast an engine achieves its full performance with growth in revolutions. The lower rmp or the longer range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt faster.
9

Ground clearance

122 > 118 mm
Ground clearance is the space between the vehicle body and the ground. When it comes to the two compared cars, it is the Mercedes SLK R170 which has 3 % higher ride height when compared with the Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual. This is why the Mercedes SLK R170 will deal better with rough terrain and obstacles in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the Mercedes SLK R170.
8

Engine capacity

2,295 > 1,796 cc
The engine size of the Mercedes is by 28 % bigger when compared to the Mercedes SLK R171. For this reason the Mercedes SLK R171 will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic will be of better performance, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission installed in the Mercedes SLK R170 despite having a few drawback gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city the driver is less tired. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

805 > 828 mm
0

Rear overhang

806 > 824 mm

Cars specifications

Mercedes SLK R171 1.8 (200 Kompressor) 163HP manual Mercedes SLK R170 2.3 (230 Kompressor) 193HP automatic
    Price range luxury luxury
    Model release date 2004 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Code name R171 R170
    Class S S
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK