Trunk capacity with seats down
Width of a car directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Mercedes Vaneo is widther only by 42 millimeters in comparison to the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) and is not really relevant. The average for the „van” segment equals to approximately 1,821 millimeters and is by 4 % smaller than the same attribute of the Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual.
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual that can take by 1 l more petrol than the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998).
The Mercedes Vaneo has 16 % longer wheelbase than Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual. Thanks to this the Mercedes is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
Maximum load capacity
The Mercedes Vaneo is 172 millimeters longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual. Long cars are more spacious and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Mercedes seems to be better pick for families or those who value soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998) 1.8 16V 112HP manual may appeal to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998)'s production started only 3 years earlier than the Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual, the distance in technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Mercedes may have a bit more new solutions used in it.
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Mercedes, which is by 315 mm higher than the Mitsubishi Space Star (1998), is better option for you. However, these two cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.