Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual vs Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual

Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for

Mitsubishi Space Wagon III, model available from 1998 to 2005.
It has 2.0 i 16V 133HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Mercedes Vaneo, model available from 2001 to 2005.
It has 1.6 102HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual
Mitsubishi

16 reasons for Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133KM manual in comparison to Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

133 > 102 hp
The Mitsubishi is equipped with petrol which delivers by 30 % more horsepower than the the engine of the Mercedes Vaneo, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It seems to be googd choice to those who would like to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12 > 13.5 s
The Mercedes Vaneo accelerates from 0 to 100 Km/h relatively slower in relation to the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual. The difference in the amount of 1.5 s is is slightly to the Mitsubishi advantage, however, it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration for buying one of presented cars.
38

Trunk capacity

242 > 150 l
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon III features 92 liters larger trunk in comparison to the Mercedes Vaneo. Such a difference is quite big and it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual has 288 l bigger boot capacity than the average in its class. More spacious boot will be useful during family traveling as well as while daily driving.
33

Top speed

180 > 167 km/h
The top speed of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III is greater as compared to this of the Mercedes Vaneo which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 13 km/h is little and is imperceptible in everyday use.
22

Width

1,774 > 1,742 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon III is widther by 2 percent in relation to the Mercedes Vaneo and is not really relevant. The average for the „van” class amounts to 1,821 millimeters and is by 3 % bigger than the width of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual.
19

Fuel tank

57 > 55 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III which can hold 2 l more fuel in comparison to the Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual. The average fuel tank size in the van class, from which the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III comes from, amounts to 70 liters, whereas in van segment (represented by the Mercedes Vaneo) it equals 70 liters.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,598 cc
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon III has by 25 percent larger engine size in relation to the Mercedes Vaneo. This may have a little impact when it comes to accleration, as both values are quite simmilar.
8

Maximum load capacity

645 > 620 kg
6

Length

4,596 > 4,202 mm
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon III is 394 millimeters longer when compared to the Mercedes Vaneo. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Mitsubishi will be better driven but the Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual will be a little easier to park because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,532 > 1,479 mm
1

Tire width

205 > 185 mm
0

Number of seats

6 > 5
0

Payload

2,120 > 1,906 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Curb weight

1,475 > 1,293 kg

Mercedes

12 reasons for Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

10.7 > 12.6 l
The Mercedes Vaneo consumes of 1.9 l petrol fewer while driving inside city than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III. The Mercedes Vaneo, which is classified in van class, burns up 0.8 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “van” class equals to 11.5 l of fuel for every 100 km.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

3,002 > 1,929 l
15

Wheelbase

2,909 > 2,770 mm
The Mercedes Vaneo has 5 percent longer wheelbase than Mitsubishi Space Wagon III. Consequently the Mercedes Vaneo is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

505 > 460 km
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2001 > 1998
The difference in debut day between these two vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Mercedes Vaneo may have more advanced technologies.
1

Height

1,828 > 1,652 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual, which is by 11 % higher than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual, would be better choice for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,524 > 1,497 mm
0

Front overhang

627 > 888 mm
0

Rear overhang

664 > 932 mm
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Space Wagon III 2.0 i 16V 133HP manual Mercedes Vaneo 1.6 102HP manual
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 1998 2001
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 2,120 kg 1,906 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK