Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP vs Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP

Source: wikipedia.org Kaippally Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero III, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 3.0 V6 177HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mercury Mariner I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177KM in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

177 > 155 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Pajero III is by 14 percent grater when compared to the Mercury. As the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
19

Fuel tank

70 > 62 l
The winner of this comparison in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP that can carry by 13 % more petrol than the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP.
15

Wheelbase

2,727 > 2,627 mm
The Mitsubishi Pajero III has 4 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. Thanks to this the Mitsubishi Pajero III is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

4,613 > 4,428 mm
The Mitsubishi Pajero III is 185 millimeters longer when compared to the Mercury. Long vehicles are more spacious and in most cases provide more storage space. While the Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable driving, the Mercury may appeal to singles as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,737 > 1,730 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 7 millimeters to the advantage of the Mitsubishi is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.

Mercury

4 reasons for Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

829 > 415 l
The boot of the Mercury Mariner I is 100 percent larger in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero III. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP will be a way more handy. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can load.
22

Width

1,790 > 1,778 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is larger only by 1 % than the Mitsubishi Pajero III and is not really relevant. The average for the „large SUV” segment amounts to 1,866 millimeters and is by 76 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Mercury Mariner I is more convenient and if you regularly travel with more than one passenger then it’s the format to go for. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi generally look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi Pajero III might be a good one.
1

Model release date

2005 > 2000
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi Pajero III was unveiled only 5 years prior to the Mercury Mariner I, the gap between technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Mercury Mariner I may feature slightly more advanced solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    End of model sale 2006 2007
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK