Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP vs Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Mercury Mariner I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Nissan Terrano I, model available from 1987 to 1993.
It has 2.4 i 4WD 103HP petrol engine produced from 1987 to 1993.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual
Mercury

8 reasons for Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155KM in comparison to Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 103 hp
The Mercury Mariner I has 50 percent more horsepower than Nissan Terrano I. The Mercury will be distinctly faster speed up because of bigger power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing cars or obstacles while moving along the road should be much more easier for the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP equipped with stronger engine.
38

Trunk capacity

829 > 425 l
The trunk of the Mercury Mariner I is 404 l larger than the Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Mercury will be a way more useful. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can transport.
22

Width

1,790 > 1,726 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is larger by 4 percent in comparison to the Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” segment amounts to around 1,866 millimeters and is by 4 % bigger than the width of the Mercury Mariner I.
6

Length

4,428 > 4,365 mm
The Mercury Mariner I is 63 millimeters longer in relation to the Nissan Terrano I. The length of the vehicle is significant in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Mercury Mariner I preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Mercury Mariner I will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Terrano I will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length .
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Mercury Mariner I is more usable and if you frequently drive with more than one people then this car is only possible option for you. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Nissan Terrano I very often look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual may be a good one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Height

1,730 > 1,681 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Mercury Mariner I, which is by 49 millimeters higher than the Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual, is better option for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Model release date

2005 > 1987
0

End of model sale

2007 > 1993

Nissan

2 reasons for Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103KM manual in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

79 > 62 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank size is Nissan Terrano I which is able to carry by 17 l more petrol in comparison to the Mercury.
15

Wheelbase

2,650 > 2,627 mm
The Nissan Terrano I has 23 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Mercury. Thanks to this the Nissan is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.

Cars specifications

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP Nissan Terrano I 2.4 i 4WD 103HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 1987
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 2,248 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK