Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP vs Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118HP manual

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

6 reasons for

Mercury Mariner I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Nissan Terrano II, model available from 1993 to 2003.
It has 2.4 i 12V 118HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2000.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118HP manual
Mercury

6 reasons for Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155KM in comparison to Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 118 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of drivers look at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Mercury which has by 31 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Nissan Terrano II. Therefore the Mercury Mariner I can reach higher speed. Having more horsepower the Mercury Mariner I should as well provide better flexiblility in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

829 > 115 l
The boot of the Mercury is 621 percent more spacious in comparison to the Nissan Terrano II. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Mercury will be much more handy. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can carry.
22

Width

1,790 > 1,755 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability while driving. The width of the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is larger only by 35 mm compared with the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118HP manual and is not really relevant. The average for the „large off-road 4x4” class is around 1,866 millimeters and is by 4 percent bigger than the same attribute of the Mercury Mariner I.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Mercury Mariner I is more convenient and if you regularly travel with more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Nissan Terrano II very often look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Nissan Terrano II might be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2005 > 1993
Production of the older vehicle commenced 12 years prior to its rival and for this reason it seems to be right to assume that this car has not so modern technologies applied.
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2003

Nissan

4 reasons for Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118KM manual in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

71 > 62 l
The Mercury Mariner I is worst that the Nissan Terrano II in the category of fuel tank size. The Nissan Terrano II is able to take by 15 % more fuel than its rival.
15

Wheelbase

2,650 > 2,627 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Nissan has 23 mm longer wheelbase distance than Mercury. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Nissan Terrano II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,693 > 4,428 mm
The Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118HP manual is 6 percent longer in relation to the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. Long cars have roomy cabin and usually provide more storage space. Although the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118HP manual seems to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides, the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,852 > 1,730 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of putting big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars of 7 percent in favor of the Nissan Terrano II is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 118HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 1993
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 2,515 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK