Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic vs Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic

Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org El monty Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

10 reasons for

Microcar M.Go, model available from 2008.
It has 0.5 15HP ic petrol engine produced from 2008.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

8 reasons for

Smart Fortwo II Coupe, model available from 2007.
It has 0.8 cdi 45HP ic diesel engine produced from 2007 to 2010.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic
Microcar

10 reasons for Microcar M.Go 0.5 15KM automat in comparison to Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

370 > 219 l
The Microcar features 151 liters larger boot than the Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic. Such a difference is quite significant so it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Microcar M.Go has 71 % bigger boot capacity than the average in its class. Larger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also while daily driving.
22

Width

1,673 > 1,555 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Microcar is 118 millimeters wider when compared to the Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,015 > 1,867 mm
Microcar has 8 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Smart Fortwo II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
6

Length

3,026 > 2,695 mm
The Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic is 331 millimeters longer in comparison to the Smart. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Microcar M.Go very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Microcar M.Go will be better driven ,however, the Smart Fortwo II will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
An owner of the Microcar M.Go gets a one door more at the back of a car. It will allow him to place luggage into a trunk in easier manner, especialy when it comes to things of big size. Passages of both cars who want to travel in the back have to get in a car through a front door which requires folding a front seat.
1

Model release date

2008 > 2007
Because of the fact that the Smart started to be manufactured only 1 year earlier than the Microcar M.Go, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Microcar M.Go may have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,553 > 1,541 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic, which is by 1 % higher than the Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic, is appropriate option for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Turning circle

4.1 > 8.7 m.
The Microcar has 4.6 m. smaller turning circle than the Smart Fortwo II Coupe. As the difference is really noticeable, the Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic has better maneuverability in tight, urban traffic unlike the the Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic, which is harder to park.
0

Number of seats

4 > 2
0

Front track

1,297 > 1,283 mm

Smart

8 reasons for Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45KM automat in comparison to Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

45 > 15 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Smart Fortwo II Coupe, which has by 200 percent more horsepower when compared to the Microcar M.Go, which makes this vehicle considerably faster. Thanks to more horsepower the Smart Fortwo II Coupe will also give significantly better flexiblility in specific gears.
33

Top speed

135 > 45 km/h
The Microcar has by 90 km/h lower maximum speed compared to the Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic. Such a relevant difference between these two vehicles points out that it is aimless to compare them.
19

Fuel tank

34 > 17 l
The Microcar M.Go loses with the Smart Fortwo II Coupe in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic is able to take by 17 l more fuel than its competitor.
14

Cylinders

3 > 2
8

Engine capacity

798 > 504 cc
The Smart Fortwo II has 58 percent bigger engine capacity in relation to the Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic. The difference is considerable. As a result the Smart Fortwo II Coupe should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement usually results in worst fuel efficiency.
4

Rear track

1,387 > 1,307 mm
3

Price range

popular > cheap
0

Curb weight

775 > 350 kg

Cars specifications

Microcar M.Go 0.5 15HP automatic Smart Fortwo II Coupe 0.8 cdi 45HP automatic
    Price range cheap popular
    Model release date 2008 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class micro A micro A
    Payload - 1,053 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK