Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual vs Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

16 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

11 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
Nissan

16 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.6 > 6.2 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 0.6 l less in the combined cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi. The difference in the amount of 10 percent is not realy noticeable. At the same time in the long run it would give a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

190 > 152 Nm
The Nissan Qashqai II has 25 % more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX. Even though a large number of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a car, it shows the best how a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is quite small and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
54

Urban consumption

6.9 > 7.8 l
The Nissan Qashqai II burns up 0.9 l less while driving inside city in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. The difference in the amount of 12 % is not perceptible in daily use of the car nonetheless during the term of a several months it can generate a real savings.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.3 > 11.4 s
A small difference that amounts to 1 percent indicates that the Mitsubishi ASX is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „mini 4x4 segment, being represented by the Mitsubishi ASX, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.5 s higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
36

Trunk capacity

438 > 418 l
If you are looking for a car for long cruises, which could carry more luggage , decide to buy the Nissan Qashqai II. The Mitsubishi has by 5 percent smaller boot than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual so in this case you would be able to take with you a bit less. Examining the luggage compartment check its dimensions which have notable impact on loading capability .
Add a comment
418 l is for 4x4 model. Otherwise Mitsubishi have bigger trunk capacity
29

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is reached shows us how fast an engine reaches its best performance with increase in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the longer range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
23

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5 l
20

Width

1,800 > 1,770 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is larger by 2 percent in relation to the Mitsubishi and is not really relevant. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” segment equals to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 3 mm larger than the width of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
9

Length

4,380 > 4,296 mm
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is 84 mm longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Nissan Qashqai II very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Nissan Qashqai II will be better driven but the Mitsubishi ASX SUV will be a little easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
9

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual have a higher speed count in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX which means that Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual will achieve better speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
7

Gross trailer weight

1,199 > 1,102 kg
3

Rear track

1,563 > 1,525 mm
2

Model release date

2014 > 2010
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace and for that reason the Nissan Qashqai II may feature more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,525 mm
0

Curb weight

1,314 > 1,240 kg

Mitsubishi

11 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

117 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Mitsubishi ASX SUV which has by 2 % horsepower more in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II, which makes this car somewhat faster. Thanks to more horsepower the Mitsubishi ASX will also provide slightly more efficiency in specific speeds.
20

Fuel tank

62 > 54 l
In this category it is the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual which can contain 8 l more fuel in relation to the Nissan. The medium fuel tank capacity in the mini 4x4 class, which is represented by the Mitsubishi ASX SUV, amounts to 61 l, whereas in compact SUV segment (represented by the Nissan Qashqai II) it equals 61 l.
16

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,644 mm
Mitsubishi has 32 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Nissan. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
16

Range

1,050 > 982 km
12

Urban range

808 > 797 km
8

Extra-urban range

1,260 > 1,122 km
7

Maximum load capacity

625 > 542 kg
4

Engine capacity

1,589 > 1,198 cc
The Mitsubishi ASX SUV has 391 cubic centimeters bigger engine capacity when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference is relatively considerable. As a result the Mitsubishi ASX SUV should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement affects worst fuel economy.
2

Height

1,615 > 1,590 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Mitsubishi, which is by 25 mm higher than the Nissan Qashqai II, would be better choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Payload

1,869 > 1,860 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

746 > 679 kg

Cars specifications

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,199 kg 1,102 kg
    Model release date 2014 2010
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK