Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual vs Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

20 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
Mitsubishi

20 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

117 > 90 hp
The Mitsubishi ASX has by 27 horsepowers more horsepower in comparison to Renault Captur. The Mitsubishi ASX will be distinctly faster accelerate because of grater power. Also getting ahead of cars or obstacles should be a piece of cake for the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

152 > 135 Nm
The Mitsubishi ASX has 17 newton meters more torque when compared to the Renault Captur. Although the majority of people do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it presents the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is little and for that reason you probably will not feel the difference.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.4 > 12.9 s
A little difference in the amount of 1.5 s shows that the Renault is slightly beaten here. In the „small off-road 4x4” segment, to which the Renault is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 18 percent faster than acceleration of Renault’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

418 > 377 l
The boot of the Mitsubishi ASX is only 11 percent bigger than the Renault Captur. However, the difference is not significant and it would be fair to say that both vehicles have similar trunk capacity.
33

Top speed

183 > 171 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Mitsubishi is greater in relation to of the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual by 12 kilometers/hour, which allows the Mitsubishi to travel faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 12 km/h is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
19

Range

1,050 > 918 km
19

Fuel tank

62 > 46 l
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual is worst that the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Mitsubishi ASX is able to store by 35 percent more fuel in relation to its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,601 mm
Mitsubishi has 75 mm longer wheelbase than the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
12

Urban range

808 > 750 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,260 > 1,047 km
8

Engine capacity

1,589 > 899 cc
The engine capacity of the Mitsubishi is by 77 percent larger in comparison to the Renault Captur. In a consequence the Renault Captur will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
8

Maximum load capacity

625 > 557 kg
6

Length

4,296 > 4,122 mm
The Mitsubishi ASX is 4 percent longer in relation to the Renault. The length of the car plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Mitsubishi ASX very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual will be better driven but the Renault Captur will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,525 > 1,514 mm
1

Height

1,615 > 1,566 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Mitsubishi, which is by 49 mm higher than the Renault Captur, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Payload

1,869 > 1,662 kg
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,240 > 1,100 kg

Renault

9 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 6.2 l
The Renault Captur burns up 1.1 l less in the combined cycle when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX. The difference at the level of 1.1 l is not significant. Nevertheless within some time it would give a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 7.8 l
The Renault Captur consumes 23 % less fuel in urban cycle than the Mitsubishi. The difference at the level of 1.8 l will be quite big in using vehicle. Additionally, within years it may give gigantic cost savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably lifted if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars selected by you is so big that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,500 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the highest torque is delivered determines how fast an engine achieves its best efficiency with increase in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 5 l
22

Width

1,778 > 1,770 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual is 8 mm wider than the Mitsubishi. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2010
Because of the fact that the Mitsubishi ASX SUV was unveiled only 3 years prior to the Renault Captur, the gap between technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Renault may have a bit more new solutions applied in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,529 > 1,525 mm
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,102 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK