Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

24 reasons for

Volvo XC60 SUV, model available from 2008.
It has 2.4 D4 163HP diesel engine produced from 2012 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

2 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
Volvo

24 reasons for Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

163 > 117 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 which has by 39 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. Therefore the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 can reach higher top speed. Having more horsepower the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 should as well give seemingly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 6.2 l
The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 burns up 10 percent fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The difference at the level of 0.6 l is not realy noticeable. Nevertheless in the long run it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 152 Nm
When you push the gas and you start speeding up fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will feel it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Volvo XC60 SUV as it has 176 percent more torque in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX. Presented cars vary so much that only riding the Volvo XC60 SUV you will have a pleasurable feeling of getting pressed back in the seat as the car starts to accelerate.
56

Urban consumption

6.5 > 7.8 l
The Volvo consumes 1.3 l fewer in the urban cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The difference at the level of 1.3 l is not significant in everyday use of the vehicle, however, within a year it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 11.4 s
The Mitsubishi ASX speeds up relatively slower in relation to the Volvo XC60 SUV. The difference in the amount of 0.9 s is quite little and it should not be strongly taken into consideration when choosing one of presented cars.
38

Trunk capacity

495 > 418 l
With more trunk space the Volvo will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional car than the Mitsubishi. If the capacity of the boot is important to you, the Volvo XC60 SUV will be better to buy because it is around 18 % more spacious than the trunk of the Mitsubishi ASX.
33

Top speed

195 > 183 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Volvo XC60 SUV is greater than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual by 7, which allows the Volvo to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 7 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
This big difference stems from the fact that both vehicles have various engines. The Volvo XC60 SUV is equipped with the diesel engine whereas the Mitsubishi has the petrol engine. Taking into account different types of engines, comparing this feature is pointless.
22

Width

1,889 > 1,770 mm
Width of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability on road. The Volvo XC60 is widther by 119 millimeters in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” segment is 1,797 millimeters and is by 5 % larger than the same attribute of the Volvo XC60.
19

Range

1,228 > 1,050 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 62 l
The Mitsubishi loses with the Volvo in the field of fuel tank size. The Volvo XC60 SUV is able to take by 13 percent more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi.
15

Wheelbase

2,775 > 2,676 mm
Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 has 99 mm longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
12

Urban range

1,077 > 808 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,373 > 1,260 km
9

Ground clearance

231 > 171 mm
Ground clearance means the gap between the vehicle body and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Volvo XC60 SUV which has 60 mm higher ground clearance in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. For this reason the Volvo XC60 SUV will cope better with rough terrain and obstacles in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the vehicle.
8

Engine capacity

2,401 > 1,589 cc
The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 has 51 % larger cubic capacity than the Mitsubishi ASX. The difference is considerable. For this reason the Volvo should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine size usually results in worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,629 > 4,296 mm
The Volvo XC60 SUV is 333 millimeters longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases have more storage space. While the Volvo XC60 occurs to be better for families or persons who value convenient rides, the Mitsubishi may appeal to city drivers because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,586 > 1,525 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,714 > 1,615 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Volvo XC60, which is by 6 % higher than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV, is appropriate choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,635 > 1,525 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16

Mitsubishi

2 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
24

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 5.1 l
1

Model release date

2010 > 2008
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace what may cause that the Mitsubishi ASX may have more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.

Cars specifications

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D4 163HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,102 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2008 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK