The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Volvo that has by 68 more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Therefore the Volvo is able to reach higher velocity. With more horsepower the Volvo XC60 SUV will also give more flexiblility in specific speeds.
When you step on the gas and you start speeding up fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Volvo XC60 SUV as it has 163 percent more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX. Presented vehicles differ so much that only riding the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 you will experience a pleasurable sensations of getting pinned back in the seat as it starts to accelerate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference in the amount of 1.9 s suggests that the Mitsubishi ASX is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.5 s higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
With more trunk space the Volvo will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull one than the Mitsubishi ASX. If the size of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Volvo XC60 SUV will be better to buy because it is around 18 percent more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
The maximum velocity of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 is greater in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi ASX which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 12 percent is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
Maximal torque RPM
The RMP at which the highest torque is reached determines how fast an engine reaches its best output with increase in rmp. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The Volvo XC60 is widther only by 119 mm than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV and is not really important. The average for the „compact SUV” class amounts to 1,797 mm and is by 5 percent larger than the same attribute of the Volvo XC60.
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 that can hold 8 l more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi ASX. The average fuel container size in the compact SUV class, from which the Volvo XC60 SUV comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual) it is 61 liters.
Volvo XC60 SUV has 4 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
Number of gears
The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 have a higher speed count compared with the Mitsubishi ASX SUV which means
that Volvo XC60 should have
faster acceleration and better fuel
economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag
racing at a timed event you would not
observe the difference.
Ground clearance is a crucial factor in many relevant features of a car. Clearance is very important in off-road cars still all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Volvo XC60 SUV has 60 millimeters larger clearance in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Apart from easier mobility in rough terrain, the Volvo XC60 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high kerbstones, for example.
The Volvo has 812 cc bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX. The difference is relatively substantia. Consequently the Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement usually means worst fuel efficiency.
Gross trailer weight
The Volvo XC60 is 333 mm longer when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Long cars have more interior space and also have bigger trunk. While the Volvo occurs to be better pick for families or persons who value soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Mitsubishi ASX SUV may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference at the level of 6 % in favor of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 is insignificant and does not matter much.