Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Volvo XC60 SUV, model available from 2008.
It has 2.4 D5 185HP diesel engine produced from 2008 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 MIVEC 117HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
Volvo

22 reasons for Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

185 > 117 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Volvo that has by 68 more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Therefore the Volvo is able to reach higher velocity. With more horsepower the Volvo XC60 SUV will also give more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

400 > 152 Nm
When you step on the gas and you start speeding up fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Volvo XC60 SUV as it has 163 percent more torque when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX. Presented vehicles differ so much that only riding the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 you will experience a pleasurable sensations of getting pinned back in the seat as it starts to accelerate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.5 > 11.4 s
A little difference in the amount of 1.9 s suggests that the Mitsubishi ASX is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.5 s higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
38

Trunk capacity

495 > 418 l
With more trunk space the Volvo will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull one than the Mitsubishi ASX. If the size of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Volvo XC60 SUV will be better to buy because it is around 18 percent more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
33

Top speed

205 > 183 km/h
The maximum velocity of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 is greater in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi ASX which allows to travel the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 12 percent is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,000 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is reached determines how fast an engine reaches its best output with increase in rmp. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
22

Width

1,889 > 1,770 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The Volvo XC60 is widther only by 119 mm than the Mitsubishi ASX SUV and is not really important. The average for the „compact SUV” class amounts to 1,797 mm and is by 5 percent larger than the same attribute of the Volvo XC60.
19

Fuel tank

70 > 62 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 that can hold 8 l more fuel compared with the Mitsubishi ASX. The average fuel container size in the compact SUV class, from which the Volvo XC60 SUV comes from, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 segment (represented by the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual) it is 61 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,775 > 2,676 mm
Volvo XC60 SUV has 4 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 have a higher speed count compared with the Mitsubishi ASX SUV which means that Volvo XC60 should have faster acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
9

Ground clearance

231 > 171 mm
Ground clearance is a crucial factor in many relevant features of a car. Clearance is very important in off-road cars still all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Volvo XC60 SUV has 60 millimeters larger clearance in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Apart from easier mobility in rough terrain, the Volvo XC60 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

2,401 > 1,589 cc
The Volvo has 812 cc bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi ASX. The difference is relatively substantia. Consequently the Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement usually means worst fuel efficiency.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,797 > 1,102 kg
6

Length

4,629 > 4,296 mm
The Volvo XC60 is 333 mm longer when compared to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual. Long cars have more interior space and also have bigger trunk. While the Volvo occurs to be better pick for families or persons who value soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Mitsubishi ASX SUV may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,586 > 1,525 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,714 > 1,615 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference at the level of 6 % in favor of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,635 > 1,525 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Curb weight

1,803 > 1,240 kg

Mitsubishi

3 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117KM manual in comparison to Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.2 > 7.4 l
The Mitsubishi burns up 16 % less in the mixed cycle in relation to the Volvo. The difference at the level of 1.2 l is not significant. Nevertheless within some time it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
19

Range

1,050 > 933 km
1

Model release date

2010 > 2008
Given that the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4's production began only 2 years prior to the Mitsubishi, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Mitsubishi may have slightly more modern solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.4 D5 185HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi ASX SUV 1.6 MIVEC 117HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,797 kg 1,102 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2008 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK