The boot of the Mitsubishi is 147 percent larger in relation to the Nissan Pixo. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Mitsubishi will be a way more useful. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Mitsubishi Colt II is 2 percent wider in comparison to the Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP which can carry by 29 % more fuel than the Nissan.
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Mitsubishi has 1 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Nissan. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Mitsubishi should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Mitsubishi Colt II is 310 mm longer than the Nissan Pixo 1.0 68HP manual. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP will be better driven ,however, the Nissan will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.