Skoda 105 II 1.0 105 S,L 44HP vs Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP

Skoda 105 II 1.0 105 S,L 44HP

Source: wikipedia.org Ludek Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

6 reasons for

Skoda 105 II, model available from 1983 to 1990.
It has 1.0 105 S,L 44HP petrol engine produced from 1988 to 1990.
Drive has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt II, model available from 1984 to 1988.
It has 1.2 EL,GL 55HP petrol engine produced from 1984 to 1986.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP
Skoda

6 reasons for Skoda 105 II 1.0 105 S,L 44KM in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP

Reasons for
15

Wheelbase

2,402 > 2,373 mm
The Skoda 105 II has 1 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt II. Therefore the Skoda 105 II is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

4,200 > 3,875 mm
The Skoda is 8 % longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Colt II. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Skoda probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Skoda will be better driven but the Mitsubishi will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,350 > 1,338 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 3
The three-door model of Mitsubishi Colt II is easy to place baggage into a boot, whereas 4-door Skoda 105 II gives easier getting into the vehicle, more quiet cabin but smaller boot lid.
1

Height

1,398 > 1,362 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Skoda 105 II 1.0 105 S,L 44HP, which is by 3 % higher than the Mitsubishi Colt II, would be better choice for you. However, presented cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
0

End of model sale

1990 > 1988

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55KM in comparison to Skoda 105 II 1.0 105 S,L 44HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

55 > 44 hp
The Mitsubishi is equipped with petrol which delivers by 25 percent more horsepower than the Skoda, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It seems to be better choice to those who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
22

Width

1,635 > 1,614 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP is larger by 21 mm than the Skoda and is not really important. The medium for the „supermini” segment is approximately 1,645 mm and is by 1 percent smaller than the same feature of the Mitsubishi Colt II.
19

Fuel tank

44 > 37 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Mitsubishi that can carry 7 l more fuel compared with the Skoda 105 II. The average fuel container size in the subcompact class, which is represented by the Mitsubishi, is 44 l, whereas in B class (represented by the Skoda) it is 44 l.
1

Model release date

1984 > 1983
Because of the fact that the Skoda 105 II's production started only 1 year earlier than the Mitsubishi Colt II, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really huge, however, the Mitsubishi Colt II may feature slightly more advanced solutions applied in it.
0

Front track

1,391 > 1,389 mm

Cars specifications

Skoda 105 II 1.0 105 S,L 44HP Mitsubishi Colt II 1.2 EL,GL 55HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1983 1984
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    End of model sale 1990 1988
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK