Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual vs Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

18 reasons for

Nissan Micra III Cabrio, model available from 2003 to 2010.
It has 1.4 i 16V 88HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt IV, model available from 1992 to 1996.
It has 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP petrol engine produced from 1992 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual
Nissan

18 reasons for Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

88 > 75 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of us pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Nissan Micra III Cabrio which has by 17 % horsepower more in comparison to the Mitsubishi Colt IV, which makes this car a bit quicker. Because of more horsepower the Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual should as well provide slightly more flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

6.3 > 7.1 l
The Nissan uses 0.8 l less in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The difference in the amount of 11 percent is not perceptible. However within some time it would allow you to make a real savings.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.9 > 12.5 s
A small difference in the amount of 5 % suggests that the Mitsubishi Colt IV is slightly beaten here. In the „B” class, to which the Mitsubishi is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 12.9 s and is by 0.4 s slower than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

370 > 240 l
The Nissan Micra III Cabrio has 130 liters more capable luggage compartment than the Mitsubishi. Such a difference is significant therefore it will affect the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Nissan has 24 % bigger boot size than the average in the same class. Roomy boot will be useful during family journeys and also during everyday driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

585 > 576 l
33

Top speed

172 > 170 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual is greater compared with this of the Mitsubishi by 1, which allows the Nissan Micra III Cabrio to cover quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 1 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
19

Range

730 > 725 km
15

Wheelbase

2,428 > 2,415 mm
Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual has 13 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Mitsubishi Colt IV. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

1,387 > 1,298 cc
The Nissan has by 7 percent larger engine size in relation to the Mitsubishi Colt IV. This may have a little impact when it comes to accleration, as both values does not differ much.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi generally look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual might be better one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2003 > 1992
Manufacture of the older vehicle began 11 years prior to its contender thus it seems to be right to assume that this vehicle features significantly less advanced solutions applied.
1

Height

1,525 > 1,364 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Nissan, which is by 12 % higher than the Mitsubishi Colt IV, would be better choice for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,480 > 1,450 kg
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 3
0

End of model sale

2010 > 1996
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

972 > 904 kg

Mitsubishi

4 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75KM manual in comparison to Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,680 > 1,663 mm
Width of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Mitsubishi is larger only by 1 percent compared with the Nissan Micra III and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small cars” class is 1,645 millimeters and is by 35 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual.
19

Fuel tank

49 > 45 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the category of fuel tank size is Mitsubishi Colt IV that can take by 4 l more petrol in comparison to the Nissan Micra III Cabrio.
8

Maximum load capacity

542 > 500 kg
6

Length

3,877 > 3,715 mm
The Mitsubishi Colt IV is 162 millimeters longer in relation to the Nissan Micra III. Long cars are more spacious and in most cases provide bigger trunk. Although the Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual seems to be better choice for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Nissan may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.

Cars specifications

Nissan Micra III Cabrio 1.4 i 16V 88HP manual Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2003 1992
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,480 kg 1,450 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK