Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual vs Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

11 reasons for

Renault Clio IV Grandtour, model available from 2012.
It has 1.2 16V 74HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt IV, model available from 1992 to 1996.
It has 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP petrol engine produced from 1992 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual
Renault

11 reasons for Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.7 > 7.1 l
The Renault consumes 20 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi Colt IV. The Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual, which is palced in „B” segment uses by 0.3 l less of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6 liters.
38

Trunk capacity

443 > 240 l
The trunk of the Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual is 203 liters larger in comparison to the Mitsubishi Colt IV. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Renault Clio IV will be a way more convenient. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
19

Range

818 > 725 km
15

Wheelbase

2,589 > 2,415 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Renault Clio IV has 7 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mitsubishi Colt IV. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Renault Clio IV Grandtour should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,267 > 3,877 mm
The Renault is 10 % longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Colt IV. Long cars are more spacious and usually have more storage space. While the Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual seems to be better for families or drivers who value convenient driving, the Mitsubishi may appeal to singles as it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no question that the five-door Renault Clio IV Grandtour is more usable and if you regularly travel with more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual very often look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Mitsubishi may be a good one.
1

Height

1,445 > 1,364 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 6 % in favor of the Renault Clio IV Grandtour is insignificant and does not matter much.
1

Model release date

2012 > 1992
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 3
0

Valves

16 > 12

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75KM manual in comparison to Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

75 > 74 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Mitsubishi Colt IV that has by 1 % horsepower more than the Renault, which makes this car a bit faster. Because of more horsepower the Mitsubishi should also provide slightly more efficiency in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.5 > 15.4 s
A small difference that amounts to 19 % suggests that the Renault Clio IV is the worst car of these two presented. In the „B segment, being represented by the Renault, the average acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 12.9 s and is by 20 % higher than this of Renault vehicle.
33

Top speed

170 > 167 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Mitsubishi Colt IV is greater in relation to this of the Renault Clio IV Grandtour by 3 km/h, which allows the Mitsubishi to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 2 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

49 > 46 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Mitsubishi Colt IV which can hold 3 l more fuel in comparison to the Renault. The medium fuel tank size in the supermini segment, which is represented by the Mitsubishi, amounts to 44 l, whereas in B class (represented by the Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual) it is 44 liters.
8

Engine capacity

1,298 > 1,150 cc
The Mitsubishi has by 13 percent bigger engine size when compared to the Renault. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not differ much.

Cars specifications

Renault Clio IV Grandtour 1.2 16V 74HP manual Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 1992
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload - 1,450 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK