Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual vs Suzuki Swift I 1.3 GTi/GXi 101HP manual

Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

8 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt IV, model available from 1992 to 1996.
It has 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP petrol engine produced from 1992 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Suzuki Swift I, model available from 1983 to 1989.
It has 1.3 GTi/GXi 101HP petrol engine produced from 1986 to 1989.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Swift I 1.3 GTi/GXi 101HP manual
Mitsubishi

8 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Swift I 1.3 GTi/GXi 101HP manual

Reasons for
22

Width

1,680 > 1,600 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual is 80 mm wider when compared to the Suzuki Swift I. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

49 > 41 l
The Suzuki Swift I gives way to the Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual in the field of fuel tank capacity. The Mitsubishi is able to store by 20 percent more fuel in relation to the Suzuki Swift I.
15

Wheelbase

2,415 > 2,365 mm
The Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Suzuki Swift I. Consequently the Mitsubishi is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

3,877 > 3,614 mm
The Mitsubishi Colt IV is 263 millimeters longer in relation to the Suzuki Swift I. Long cars have roomy cabin and also have bigger trunk. Although the Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual occurs to be better option for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Suzuki Swift I may appeal to women as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Model release date

1992 > 1983
Manufacture of the older car commenced much more earlier than its rival and for this reason it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle has not so advanced technologies applied.
0

Maximal power RPM

6,000 > 6,600 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

1996 > 1989
0

Curb weight

904 > 752 kg

Suzuki

6 reasons for Suzuki Swift I 1.3 GTi/GXi 101KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

101 > 75 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers take into account at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Suzuki Swift I which has by 35 % more horsepower when compared to the Mitsubishi. Therefore the Suzuki Swift I can reach higher maximum speed. Because of more horsepower the Suzuki will also provide seemingly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.6 > 12.5 s
The Suzuki Swift I 1.3 GTi/GXi 101HP manual speeds up to 100k\h 3.9 s better than the Mitsubishi. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Suzuki will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
8

Engine capacity

1,299 > 1,298 cc
The Suzuki Swift I 1.3 GTi/GXi 101HP manual has by 1 cubic centimeter greater engine capacity in relation to the Mitsubishi Colt IV. This may have a little impact in terms of acceleration, as both values does not differ much.
1

Height

1,540 > 1,364 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Suzuki Swift I, which is by 176 mm higher than the Mitsubishi, would be better choice for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 3
0

Valves

16 > 12

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Colt IV 1.3 GLi 12V 75HP manual Suzuki Swift I 1.3 GTi/GXi 101HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1992 1983
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,450 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK