Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d 1.1 DOHC 75HP manual vs Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual

Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d 1.1 DOHC 75HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias93 All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d, model available from 2008 to 2011.
It has 1.1 DOHC 75HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d, model available from 2005 to 2011.
It has 1.0 VVT-i 69HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2011.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual
Mitsubishi

16 reasons for Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d 1.1 DOHC 75KM manual in comparison to Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

75 > 69 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d is 9 percent grater when compared to the Toyota. Because the difference is little this should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
59

Maximal torque

98 > 91 Nm
The Mitsubishi Colt VII has 8 % more torque in relation to the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d. Even though most of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it presents the best how a car is speeding up. When it comes to compared cars the difference is not really big and for that reason the difference will not be much noticeable.
56

Urban consumption

5.9 > 6 l
The Mitsubishi uses 2 % less running around the town in relation to the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d. The difference at the level of 0.1 l is not perceptible in everyday usage of the automobile nonetheless during the term of a year it would allow you to make a substantial cost reduction.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.8 > 15.7 s
A little difference at the level of 2.9 s indicates that the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „B segment, being represented by the Toyota, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 12.9 s and is by 22 % higher than this of Toyota vehicle.
33

Top speed

162 > 155 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d is greater in relation to the Toyota by 5, which allows the Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d 1.1 DOHC 75HP manual to travel quicker large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 5 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 4.5 l
22

Width

1,695 > 1,691 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability while driving. The width of the Mitsubishi Colt VII is larger only by 4 millimeters than the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual and is not really relevant. The medium for the „supermini” class amounts to around 1,645 millimeters and is by 50 millimeters smaller than the same feature of the Mitsubishi.
19

Range

959 > 840 km
19

Fuel tank

46 > 43 l
The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual gives way to the Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d 1.1 DOHC 75HP manual in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Mitsubishi is able to carry by 3 liters more fuel in comparison to its rival.
15

Wheelbase

2,500 > 2,461 mm
The Mitsubishi has 39 mm longer wheelbase in relation to Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d. Thanks to this the Mitsubishi Colt VII is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

797 > 700 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,093 > 933 km
8

Engine capacity

1,123 > 998 cc
The Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d has by 125 cc larger engine displacement when compared to the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d. This may have a little impact when it comes to accleration, as both values does not vary much.
8

Maximum load capacity

485 > 455 kg
6

Length

3,880 > 3,750 mm
The Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d is 3 percent longer when compared to the Toyota Yaris II. Long cars more of passenger space and also provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Mitsubishi Colt VII occurs to be better option for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d may be more appropriate to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Model release date

2008 > 2005
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d may have more modern solutions.

Toyota

7 reasons for Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d 1.1 DOHC 75HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5 > 5.1 l
The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual uses 0.1 l less fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Mitsubishi Colt VII. The Toyota, which is palced in „supermini” class uses by 1 liter less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 6 liters.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,605 > 3,995 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the highest torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine achieves its best output with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the wider range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration is felt earlier.
4

Rear track

1,470 > 1,444 mm
1

Height

1,532 > 1,521 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of stuff to it. The difference that amounts to 11 mm in favor of the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

1,440 > 1,422 kg
0

Front track

1,480 > 1,460 mm
0

Curb weight

988 > 935 kg

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Colt VII Hatchback 3d 1.1 DOHC 75HP manual Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 755 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK