Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP vs Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP

Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP

Source: wikipedia.org Slvrbot All Rights Released into the public domain

4 reasons for

Toyota Model F, model available from 1980 to 1990.
It has 1.8 i 88HP petrol engine produced from 1983 to 1990.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

Mitsubishi L300 I, model available from 1980 to 1986.
It has 2.0 65HP petrol engine produced from 1980 to 1986.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP
Toyota

4 reasons for Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88KM in comparison to Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

88 > 65 hp
The Toyota comes with petrol which makes by 23 more horsepower than the the engine of the Mitsubishi L300 I, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It should be googd choice to those who would like to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
15

Wheelbase

2,247 > 2,203 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Toyota has 44 millimeters longer wheelbase distance than Mitsubishi L300 I. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Hence, the mass of Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,294 > 4,153 mm
The Toyota is 141 mm longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi L300 I. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Toyota Model F will be better driven but the Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
0

End of model sale

1990 > 1986

Mitsubishi

1 reason for Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65KM in comparison to Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP

Reasons for
22

Width

1,700 > 1,685 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Mitsubishi L300 I is larger by 1 % compared with the Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP and is not really relevant. The medium for the „van” segment equals to approximately 1,821 mm and is by 7 percent bigger than the width of the Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP.

Cars specifications

Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1980 1980
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    End of model sale 1990 1986

Compare with other cars

Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Ford Econovan 1.4 52HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP vs Ford Econovan 1.4 52HP
Subaru Libero I 1.0 50HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Subaru Libero I 1.0 50HP vs Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP
Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Nissan Prairie I 1.5 S 75HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP vs Nissan Prairie I 1.5 S 75HP
Ford Econoline II 4.0 120HP

Source: similarcar.com

Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Ford Econoline II 4.0 120HP vs Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP
Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Subaru Libero I 1.0 50HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Toyota Model F 1.8 i 88HP vs Subaru Libero I 1.0 50HP
Nissan Urvan II 2.4 128HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Nissan Urvan II 2.4 128HP vs Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP
Ford Galaxy II 2.0 i 116HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org

Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP

Source: wikipedia.org

Ford Galaxy II 2.0 i 116HP manual vs Mitsubishi L300 I 2.0 65HP
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK