The horsepower of the Plymouth Voyager III is 8 % grater when compared to the Mitsubishi L300 II. As the difference is small it should not affect the vehicles performance extensively.
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Plymouth Voyager III 2.5 i 86HP is 5 % wider in relation to the Mitsubishi L300 II. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The Plymouth has 781 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi L300 II. The closer the axles are to one another, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Thus the Plymouth Voyager III with a longer wheelbase may give the smoothest travel. Hovewer, the Mitsubishi with shorter wheelbases have tighter turning angles and can corner faster than equivalent vehicles having long wheelbases.
The Plymouth Voyager III is 14 % longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi L300 II. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Plymouth Voyager III very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Plymouth Voyager III 2.5 i 86HP will be better driven but the Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length .
Model release date
Given that the Mitsubishi L300 II was unveiled only 5 years before the Plymouth, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Plymouth Voyager III might have a bit more new solutions used in it.