Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual vs Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP

Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Bull-Doser All Rights Released into the public domain

6 reasons for

Pontiac Trans Sport I, model available from 1989 to 1996.
It has 2.3 i 16V 137HP petrol engine produced from 1993 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Mitsubishi L300 II, model available from 1985 to 1998.
It has 1.6 80HP petrol engine produced from 1985 to 1990.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP
Pontiac

6 reasons for Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

137 > 80 hp
The Pontiac has 57 horsepowers more horsepower in relation to Mitsubishi L300 II. The Pontiac Trans Sport I will be distinctly more dynamically speed up thanks to grater horsepower. Also overtaking other cars should be a piece of cake for the Pontiac Trans Sport I equipped with more powerful engine.
22

Width

1,883 > 1,690 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Pontiac is 11 % wider in comparison to the Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,790 > 2,243 mm
Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual has 24 percent longer wheelbase than the Mitsubishi L300 II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

2,261 > 1,599 cc
The engine capacity of the Pontiac Trans Sport I is by 662 cubic centimeters bigger in comparison to the Mitsubishi L300 II. For this reason the Mitsubishi L300 II will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Pontiac Trans Sport I will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

4,946 > 4,290 mm
The Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual is 656 mm longer than the Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP. Long cars are more spacious and in most cases provide bigger trunk. While the Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual seems to be better option for families or those who love the idea of comfortable driving, the Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP may appeal to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Model release date

1989 > 1985
Given that the Mitsubishi L300 II was unveiled only 4 years earlier than the Pontiac, the gap between technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual may feature slightly more modern solutions used in it.

Mitsubishi

2 reasons for Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80KM in comparison to Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual

Reasons for
1

Height

1,856 > 1,701 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 155 mm in favor of the Mitsubishi L300 II is small and does not matter much.
0

End of model sale

1998 > 1996

Cars specifications

Pontiac Trans Sport I 2.3 i 16V 137HP manual Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1989 1985
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    Payload 2,320 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK