Pontiac Trans Sport II 3.4 i V6 182HP manual vs Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP

Pontiac Trans Sport II 3.4 i V6 182HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Bull-Doser All Rights Released into the public domain

6 reasons for

Pontiac Trans Sport II, model available from 1996 to 1998.
It has 3.4 i V6 182HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 1998.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

Mitsubishi L300 II, model available from 1985 to 1998.
It has 1.6 80HP petrol engine produced from 1985 to 1990.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP
Pontiac

6 reasons for Pontiac Trans Sport II 3.4 i V6 182KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

182 > 80 hp
The Pontiac Trans Sport II has 102 horsepowers more horsepower in comparison to Mitsubishi. The Pontiac Trans Sport II will be distinctly more dynamically speed up because of grater amout of horses under its hoot. Also getting ahead of other cars while moving along the road should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with stronger engine.
22

Width

1,845 > 1,690 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Pontiac is 9 percent wider than the Mitsubishi L300 II. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,844 > 2,243 mm
The Pontiac has 27 % longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP. The shorter wheelbase, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Therefore the Pontiac Trans Sport II with a longer wheelbase will provide the smoothest drive. Hovewer, the Mitsubishi with shorter distance between its axles have tighter turning angles and can corner faster than equivalent vehicles with long wheelbases.
8

Engine capacity

3,351 > 1,599 cc
The Pontiac Trans Sport II has 110 percent larger cubic capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi L300 II. Such a substantial difference causes that comparision of this values is hard. The Mitsubishi would be the right choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and running costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, those who decided on the Pontiac Trans Sport II would benefit from grater power, flexibility, smoothness of the engine and consequently better joy when driving.
6

Length

4,750 > 4,290 mm
The Pontiac is 460 millimeters longer when compared to the Mitsubishi. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Pontiac Trans Sport II 3.4 i V6 182HP manual probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Pontiac will be better driven but the Mitsubishi will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

1996 > 1985
Production of the older car started much more earlier than its rival thus man may suspect that this vehicle gives way to Pontiac Trans Sport II 3.4 i V6 182HP manual because it has not so advanced solutions applied.

Mitsubishi

1 reason for Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80KM in comparison to Pontiac Trans Sport II 3.4 i V6 182HP manual

Reasons for
1

Height

1,856 > 1,712 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 144 millimeters in favor of the Mitsubishi L300 II is small and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Pontiac Trans Sport II 3.4 i V6 182HP manual Mitsubishi L300 II 1.6 80HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1985
    Facelifting no no
    Class van van
    End of model sale 1998 1998

Compare with other cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK