Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4 vs Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org 100yen Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

15 reasons for

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI, model available from 1999 to 2001.
It has 2.0 Turbo 280HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2001.
Drive 4x4 has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Toyota Celica VII, model available from 1999 to 2006.
It has 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2006.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual
Mitsubishi

15 reasons for Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

280 > 192 hp
The Mitsubishi has 88 horsepowers more horsepower in relation to Toyota Celica VII. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI will be distinctly faster accelerate owing to grater horsepower. Also getting ahead of other cars while driving should be much more easier for the Mitsubishi equipped with more powerful motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

4.9 > 7.4 s
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4 accelerates to 100k\h by 2.5 s better in comparison to the Toyota Celica VII. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Mitsubishi will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
22

Width

1,768 > 1,731 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mitsubishi is 37 mm wider in comparison to the Toyota. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
8

Engine capacity

1,996 > 1,796 cc
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI has by 200 cc greater cubic capacity when compared to the Toyota Celica VII. This may have a little impact when it comes to accleration, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

4,350 > 4,330 mm
The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4 is 20 mm longer in relation to the Toyota Celica VII. The length of the car is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4 preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi will be better driven but the Toyota Celica VII will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,505 > 1,480 mm
3

Number of doors

4 > 2
For drivers who are looking for a car for larger amount of passengers the four-door Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4 is a way appropriate to own. However, for those that are looking for more attractive design we suggest choosing the 2-door Toyota.
1

Height

1,416 > 1,305 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting big amount of stuff to it. The difference at the level of 111 millimeters to the advantage of the Mitsubishi is little and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

6,500 > 7,800 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Front track

1,510 > 1,490 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

45 > 50 %
0

Curb weight

1,276 > 1,214 kg

Toyota

4 reasons for Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
33

Top speed

225 > 220 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Toyota is greater in comparison to of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4 by 5 kilometers per hour, which allows the Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 5 km/h is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 49 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank size is Toyota Celica VII that is able to hold by 14 percent more gasoline in relation to the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4.
15

Wheelbase

2,600 > 2,511 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Toyota Celica VII has 4 percent longer wheelbase distance when compared to Mitsubishi. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Toyota should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
0

End of model sale

2006 > 2001

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI 2.0 Turbo 280HP manual 4x4 Toyota Celica VII 1.8 VVTL - i Sport 192HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class S S
    Payload - 1,560 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK